APHC010480702024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] SATURDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 24792/2024 Between: AKULA LALITHA, W/O NAGARAJA RAO, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/O D.NO.74-7-12C, JD NAGAR, PATAMATA, VENKATESWARAPURAM, VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR DISTRICT, GUNTUR, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, LALAPET POLICE STATION, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. SHAIK MUKARRAM PASHA, S/O MUJAHID PASHA, AGED ABOUT NOT KNOWN, R/O D.NO.18-4-18, SAYYAD KHAN STREET, STADIUM ROAD, LALAPET, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PILLI SUNDEEP Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. GOLLAMUDI ARUN KUMAR The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd Respondent in interfering in the civil disputes between the petitioner and the unofficial respondent, as well as harassing the petitioner by summoning her to the police station to settle the dispute in favor of the unofficial respondent, and 2 threatening her with false cases if she fails to comply, as illegal, arbitrary, and violative of Articles 14, 21, and 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd Respondent to cease any interference in the civil dispute between the petitioner and the unofficial respondent and to refrain from harassing or threatening the petitioner.” 2. None represented for the Petitioner. 3. Sri P.Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that, based on the complaint given by Respondent No.4, the Petitioner was called to the Police Station for enquiry, however, the Petitioner did not turn up. It is further submitted that, no crime has been registered against the Petitioner and the Police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the parties. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, Police are directed not to interfere with the civil disputes between the parties, except under due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:20.12.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.24792 of 2024 Dt.20.12.2025 Dinesh