APHC010597612025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3397] TUESDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO TRANS. CIVIL MISC.PETITION NO: 369/2025 Between: 1. POKURI VIJAYA LAKSHMI, W/O. PALUKURI PAVAN KALYAN ACHARI, AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS, OCC.HOUSE WIFE, R/O.HOUSE NO. 42337-7, BESIDE ASHTA LAKSHMI KALYANA MANTAPAM, BHAGYA NAGAR COLONY, CHINNA CHOWK, KADAPA CITY, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. PALUKURI PAVAN KALYAN ACHARI, S/o. Rama Subbaiah Achari Aged about 26 years,R/o.Lingala Village, Koilakuntia Mandal,Nandyal District ...RESPONDENT Petition Under Section 24 of the C.P.C. Praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith,the High Court may be pleased topleased to withdraw HMOP No. 18 of 2025 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda, Nandyal District and to transfer the same to the Court of Principal Senior Civil Judge or other competent court at Kadapa, Kadapa District, Andhra Pradesh and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to stay all further proceedings in HMOP No. 18 of 2025 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda, Nandyal District pending disposal of the main TRCMP before this Hon’ble court pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MD SALEEM Counsel for the Respondent: 1. THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.GOPALA KRISHNA RAO TRANSFER CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.369 of 2025 ORDER: Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, it was brought to the notice of this Court by the learned counsel for the petitioner that after filing of the present Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition, the respondent/husband herein has withdrawn the H.M.O.P.No.18 of 2025 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda, Nandyal District and therefore, the present petition has become infructuous and the same is also endorsed on the Court bundle to that effect. 2. Perused. 3. Considering the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. ________________________________ JUSTICE V.GOPALA KRISHNA RAO Date.18.11.2025 CVD