Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 55236 (AP)

BASAM HARIKRISHNA REDDY v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/34028/2025 · 2025-12-08

D Ramesh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010656642025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] TUESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 34028/2025 Between: 1. BASAM HARIKRISHNA REDDY, S/O. LATE VENKAT RAMI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, MADIREBAILU VILLAGE, BUKKAPATNAM MANDAL, SRI SATYASAI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PUTAPARTI, SRI SATYASAI DISTRICT. 3. THE REVENUE DISIONAL OFFICER, PUTAPARTI, SRI SATYASAI DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHASILDAR, BUKKAPATNAM MANDAL BUKKAPATNAM, SRI SATYASAI DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction, especially one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction of the 4th respondent not to consider the petitioner representation dated 15- 09-2025 for mutate the Adangal, 1-B in the name of petitioner in property of the petitioner survey No. 133 an extent of Ac.3.16 cents, survey No. 136-4 an extent of Ac.0.58 1/2 cents, survey No. 147 an extent of Ac.0.55 Vt. cents, survey No.l50-2B an extent of Ac. 1.80 2 cents, survey No. 149 an extent of Ac. 1.80 cents, survey No. 132-3 an extent of Ac.2.08 cents, survey No. 137-1 an extent of Ac.0.08 14 cents, and survey No. 136-2 an extent of Ac. 1.00 cents, situated at Kothacheruvu, Maderabailu Village, Bukkapatnam Mandal, Sri Satya Sai District is illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 14 and 19 constitution of India and consequently direct the 4th respondent to consider the petitioner representation dated 15-09-2025and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 4th respondents to consider the petitioner representation dated 15- 09- 2025 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. LINGALA HAZARATHAIAH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 3 ORDER: The present writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “…to issue a Writ, order or direction, especially one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction of the 4th respondent not to consider the petitioner representation dated 15.09.2025 for mutate the Adangal, 1-B in the name of petitioner in property of the petitioner survey No.133 an extent of Ac.3.16 cents, survey No.136-4 an extent of Ac.0.58 1/2 cents, survey No.147 an extent of Ac.0.55 ½ cents, survey No.l50-2B an extent of Ac.1.80 cents, survey No.149 an extent of Ac.1.80 cents, survey No.132-3 an extent of Ac.2.08 cents, survey No.137-1 an extent of Ac.0.08 ¼ cents and survey No.136-2 an extent of Ac.1.00 cents, situated at Kothacheruvu, Maderabailu Village, Bukkapatnam Mandal, Sri Satya Sai District is illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 14 and 19 constitution of India and consequently direct the 4th respondent to consider the petitioner representation dated 15.09.2025 and pass…” (in verbatim) 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner made several representations seeking to mutate Adnagal, 1-B in his favour. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, appearing for the respondents, submits that the petitioner did not make any online application. He further submits that if such an online application is made, the respondents will consider and pass appropriate orders as per the records. 4 4. In view of the above submissions, instead of keeping the writ petition pending, the writ petition is disposed of directing the petitioner to file an online application within a period of two (2) weeks. On filing such application, the respondents shall consider and pass appropriate orders in accordance with the records and the applicable Rules, within a period of two (2) months thereafter. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH Date: 09.12.2025 SNI 5 186 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 34028 OF 2025 Dt.09.12.2025 SNI