APHC010382602023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 19821/2023 Between: 1. BURAGOMMULA ANJANEYULU, S/O NAGULU, AGED 65 YEARS, R/O DHENUVAKONDA VILLAGE, ADDANKI MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPT, SECRETARIAT, VELLAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ONGOLE. 3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MADDIPADU P.S., MADDIPADU, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MADDIPADU P.S., MADDIPADU, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 5. KATRAGADDA SEETHARAMANJANEYULU, S/O SUBBA RAO, AGED 51 YEARS, R/O THELLABADU VILLAGE, MADDIPADU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the actions of the 3rd and 4threspondents in calling the petitioner to the Maddipadu police station repeatedly and pressurizing to settle the civil dispute between the petitioner and the 5th respondent while the same is pending before a competent civil court in E.P.No.79/2014 in 0.S.No.117/2009 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, at Ongole, as arbitrary, illegal, high-handed, violative of principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and to consequently direct the 3rd and 4threspondents not interfere in the civil disputes between the petitioner and the 5threspondent and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 3rd respondent not to interfere in the civil disputes between the petitioner and the 4th respondent in E.P.No.79/2014 in O.S.No.117/2009 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, at Ongole, pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G SAI NARAYANA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 19821 of 2023 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the actions of the 3rd and 4threspondents in calling the petitioner to the Maddipadu police station repeatedly and pressurizing to settle the civil dispute between the petitioner and the 5th respondent while the same is pending before a competent civil court in E.P.No.79/2014 in 0.S.No.117/2009 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, at Ongole, as arbitrary, illegal, high- handed, violative of principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and to consequently direct the 3rd and 4threspondents not interfere in the civil disputes between the petitioner and the 5threspondent and pass….” 2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petition may be disposed of, since the relief has become infructuous in this matter. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents is in attendance. 4. Recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 09.12.2025. TVN HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.19821 of 2023 Dated.09.12.2025 TVN 293