APHC010458102018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE APPEAL SUIT NO: 1090/2018 Between: 1. KETHINI HARU, S/O LATE K GOVINDA NAIDU, AGED 48 YEARS, EX SERVICEMAN, R/O CHERLOPALLI VILLAGE, TIRUPATHI RURAL MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT 1. KONDA VIJAYA, W/O K.PARTHASARADHI CHOWDARY, AGED 49 YEARS, R/O CHERLOPALLI VILLAGE, TIRUPATHI RURAL MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT 2. KETHINI VEDAVATHAMMA DIED, KETHINI VEDAVATHAMMA, (DIED) 3. G VIMALA, W/O G.SRINIVASULA NAIDU, AGED 56, HOUSE WIFE, R/O CHERLOPALLI VILLAGE, TIRUPATHI RURAL MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT 4. KETHINI RAJESWARI, W/O LATE RAVI, AGED 46 YEARS, HOUSE WIFE 5. K BHARGAV, S/O LATE K.RAVI, AGED 28 YEARS, UN 6. K HINDU, D/O LATE K.RAVI, AGED 26 YEARS, STUDENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM I.A.No.1 of 2025 In/and APPEAL SUIT NO: 1090/2018 KETHINI HARU, S/O LATE K GOVINDA NAIDU, AGED 48 YEARS, EX SERVICEMAN, R/O CHERLOPALLI VILLAGE, TIRUPATHI RURAL MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT ...APPELLANT AND KONDA VIJAYA, W/O K.PARTHASARADHI CHOWDARY, AGED 49 YEARS, R/O CHERLOPALLI VILLAGE, TIRUPATHI RURAL MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT KETHINI VEDAVATHAMMA DIED, KETHINI VEDAVATHAMMA, G VIMALA, W/O G.SRINIVASULA NAIDU, AGED 56, HOUSE WIFE, ERLOPALLI VILLAGE, TIRUPATHI RURAL MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT KETHINI RAJESWARI, W/O LATE RAVI, AGED 46 YEARS, HOUSE K BHARGAV, S/O LATE K.RAVI, AGED 28 YEARS, UN-EMPLOYEE, K HINDU, D/O LATE K.RAVI, AGED 26 YEARS, STUDENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3524] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM KETHINI HARU, S/O LATE K GOVINDA NAIDU, AGED 48 YEARS, EX SERVICEMAN, R/O CHERLOPALLI VILLAGE, TIRUPATHI RURAL ...APPELLANT KONDA VIJAYA, W/O K.PARTHASARADHI CHOWDARY, AGED 49 YEARS, R/O CHERLOPALLI VILLAGE, TIRUPATHI RURAL KETHINI VEDAVATHAMMA DIED, KETHINI VEDAVATHAMMA, G VIMALA, W/O G.SRINIVASULA NAIDU, AGED 56, HOUSE WIFE, ERLOPALLI VILLAGE, TIRUPATHI RURAL MANDAL, KETHINI RAJESWARI, W/O LATE RAVI, AGED 46 YEARS, HOUSE EMPLOYEE, K HINDU, D/O LATE K.RAVI, AGED 26 YEARS, STUDENT RESPONDENTS NO.4 TO 6 ARE RESIDING AT D.NO.5-55-5, SRIKRISHNA NAGAR, 3RD LANE, M.R. PALLE, TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT 7. KUDURUPATI SESHU, S/O SUBBA RAO, AGED 42 YEARS, R/O CHERLOPALLI VILLAGE, TIRUPATHI RURAL MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT (DEFENDANT NO.7 IN SUIT IS NOT NECESSARY PARTY TO THIS APPEAL) ...RESPONDENT(S): may be pleased to set aside the impugned Judgment and Decree dt.02.05.2018 in OS No.66 of 2010 on the file of X Addl District Judge, Tirupathi, and consequently dismiss the suit and may be pleased to allow Appeal Suit with costs, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To stay all further proceedings in pursuance to the impugned decree dated.02/05/2018 in OS.NO.66/2010 on the file of the X Additional Dsitrict Judge, Tirupathi, Chittoor pending disposal of the above appeal suit and apss IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to permit me to withdraw AS No. 1090/2018 without costs and pass Counsel for the Appellant: 1. V JAGAPATHI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. S PRANATHI The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM I.A.No.1 of 2025 In/and APPEAL SUIT NO: 1090/2018 JUDGMENT: (per Ravi Nath Tilhari, J) Sri K.Koutilya, learned counsel for the appellant filed I.A.No.1 of 2025 seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the A.S.No.1090 of 2018. 2. Sri K.Koutilya, learned counsel for the appellant submits that the application be allowed. 3. Sri Rahul Chowdary, learned counsel representing Ms.S.Pranathi, learned counsel for respondent No.1 has no objection. 4. In view of the above, I.A.No.1 of 2025 is allowed. Consequently, the Appeal Suit is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed. ____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI,J ______________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM,J Dated:06.11.2025 AG 166 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM I.A.No.1 of 2025 In/and APPEAL SUIT NO: 1090/2018 Dated:06.11.2025 AG