Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5522 (ALL)

RAVINDRA KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

A482/510/2025 · 2025-04-22

Raj Beer Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:61316 Court No. - 71 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 510 of 2025 Applicant :- Ravindra Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Rahul Shukla Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material brought on record. 2. This application under Section - 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred against order dated 12.08.2024, passed by learned Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Gautam Buddh Nagar, in Case No. 442 of 2018 (Pooja Vs. Ravindra), under Section - 125 Cr.P.C., Police Station - Beeta-2, District - Gautam Buddh Nagar. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that impugned order is against facts and law and thus, liable to be set aside. It was submitted that in pursuance to order dated 21.09.2022 passed by this Court in Application u/s 482 No. 29613 of 2022, applicant is ready to pay the amount of maintenance, as directed by this Court, but it is not clear that how much amount has to be paid by the applicant. Referring to these facts, it was submitted that impugned order may be set aside. 4. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the application and submitted that there is no illegality or perversity in the impugned order. 5. I have considered the rival submissions and perused the record. 6. It is apparent from record that earlier applicant has approached this Court by filing Application u/s 482 No. 29613 of 2022, which was disposed of vide order dated 21.09.2022, wherein this Court has directed the applicant to deposit Rs. 7 lakhs on or before 20.10.2022 and apart from that applicant shall also pay monthly allowance as awarded by the Family Court concerned starting from October, 2022. It appears that the learned Family Court has passed the impugned order in compliance of order of this Court. No patent illegality or perversity could be shown in the impugned order. There is nothing to show that there has been any abuse of the process of Court or the impugned order has resulted into miscarriage of justice, so as to require any interference by this Court by invoking extraordinary powers under Section - 482 Cr.P.C. The application under Section - 482 Cr.P.C. lacks merit and thus liable to be dismissed. 7. Accordingly, the application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is hereby dismissed. Order Date :- 23.4.2025 S Rawat Digitally signed by :- SHOBHIT RAWAT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad