Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 55219 (KAR)

S SELVI v. STATE BANK OF INDIA

WP/22164/2025 · 2025-08-04

B M Shyam Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30164 WP No. 22164 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 22164 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: S SELVI WIFE OF S.SATHISH, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS PERMANENTLY RESIDING AT NO.14/6, MGR STREET, KIL VISHARAM MEVISHARAM, VELLORE, TAMIL NADU-632509. CURRENTLY RESIDING AT NO.198. GROUND FLOOR, 1ST MAIN, A CROSS, NAGAPPA REDDY LAYOUT, KAGGADASAPURA, BANGALORE-560093. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. BHARATH K.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE BANK OF INDIA RASMEC HOSUR BRANCH, SRI VAARI BUILDING, PLOT NO.2, SIPCOT INDUSTRIAL ESTATE PHASE-1, ZUZUVADI (OPP ASHOK LAYLAND), HOSUR-635126. REPRESENTED BY Digitally signed by VANAMALA N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30164 WP No. 22164 of 2025 ITS AUTHORISED OFFICER. 2. SMT.LATHA.C, WIFE OF MR.CHINNAPPA, 3. MR.PRASAHNATH, SON OF MR.CHINNAPPA, BOTH ARE RESIDING AT NO.198, 1ST MAIN, A CROSS, NAGAPPA REDDY LAYOUT, KAGGADASAPURA, BANAGLORE-560093. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.PRABHU RAO., ADVOCATE FOR C/R1) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH/SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDERS PASSED BY THE X ADDITIONAL CJM, BENGALURU CITY IN CRL.MISC NO.50647/2024 (ANNEXURE-A) AND (B) DIRECT THE RESPONDENT BANK TO RESTORE POSSESSION OF THE SCHEDULE PREMISES TO THE PETITIONER IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RENTAL AGREEMENT ANNEXED AS ANNEXURE D, SINCE THE ENTIRE LOAN AVAILED BY THE BORROWERS, I.E., THE 2ND AND 3RD RESPONDENTS, HAS BEEN FULLY REPAID. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30164 WP No. 22164 of 2025 ORAL ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo which reads as under: The petitioner respectfully submits that petitioner seeks to withdraw the present petition as not pressed. Wherefore, it is therefore, most respectfully humbly prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to take this memo on record and withdraw the petition as not pressed. In view of the memo, the petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE SA ct:sr