Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 55205 (PNJ)

RAM PRASAD v. SMT. SUMITRA DEVI

COCP/2025/2024 · 2025-04-01

Harkesh Manuja

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

135 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB A RAM PRASAD SMT. SUMITRA DEVI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Mr. Surinder Pal, Mr. Arun Beniwal, Sr. DAG, Haryana. HARKESH MANUJA Learned counsel for the respondent on instructions from Smt. Sumitra Devi, District Education Officer, Jind submits that arrears of pension have been released respect to interest, learned counsel for the weeks’ time. In view thereof, no cause survives in the present petition and the same is thus, disposed of. Rule discharged. It is made clear t the aforesaid undertaking towards release of interest within two weeks, salary of Smt. attached to the extent of 1/3 Ho remedies as per law, fixation of revised pension. 01.04.2025 Tejwinder IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB A AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: RAM PRASAD Versus SMT. SUMITRA DEVI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Surinder Pal, Advocate for the Mr. Arun Beniwal, Sr. DAG, Haryana. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the respondent on instructions from Smt. Sumitra Devi, District Education Officer, Jind submits that arrears of pension have been released in favour of the petitioner, however, with respect to interest, learned counsel for the In view thereof, no cause survives in the present petition and the same is thus, disposed of. Rule discharged. It is made clear that in case the respondent fails to abide by the aforesaid undertaking towards release of interest within two weeks, salary of Smt. Sumitra Devi, District Education Officer, Jind attached to the extent of 1/3rd till the compliance is made. However, the petitioner shall also be at liberty to avail his as per law, in case, he still finds himself aggrieved of the fixation of revised pension. Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-2025-2024 Date of Decision: April 01, 2025 ........Petitioner ........Respondent HARKESH MANUJA or the petitioner. Mr. Arun Beniwal, Sr. DAG, Haryana. Learned counsel for the respondent on instructions from Smt. Sumitra Devi, District Education Officer, Jind submits that arrears in favour of the petitioner, however, with respect to interest, learned counsel for the respondent prays for two In view thereof, no cause survives in the present petition hat in case the respondent fails to abide by the aforesaid undertaking towards release of interest within two weeks, umitra Devi, District Education Officer, Jind shall remain till the compliance is made. shall also be at liberty to avail his in case, he still finds himself aggrieved of the (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No 2024 April 01, 2025 Learned counsel for the respondent on instructions from Smt. Sumitra Devi, District Education Officer, Jind submits that arrears in favour of the petitioner, however, with prays for two In view thereof, no cause survives in the present petition hat in case the respondent fails to abide by the aforesaid undertaking towards release of interest within two weeks, shall remain shall also be at liberty to avail his in case, he still finds himself aggrieved of the TEJWINDER SINGH 2025.04.02 15:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document