1 2025:CGHC:57280 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 9198 of 2025 1 - Rambakas S/o Late Bhikham Ram Aged About 35 Years R/o Village- Dharampur, P.S. Pratappur, District- Surajpur C.G. ... Applicant(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through S.H.O. P.S. Rajpur, District Balrampur-Ramanujganj C.G. ... Respondent(s) For Applicant(s) : Shri Pushkar Sinha, Advocate For Respondent/State : Shri Ajit Singh, GA (Hon’ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma) Order on Board 25/11/2025 The applicant has filed this bail application under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagrrik Suraksha Sanhita for grant of regular bail as he is in custody in connection with Crime No. 335/2023 registered at police SUGUNA DUBEY Digitally signed by SUGUNA DUBEY Date: 2025.11.28 11:09:36 +0530 2 station Rajpur, District Balrampur-Ramanujganj (CG) for the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC. 2. The prosecution case in brief is that a report was lodged by the informant Jagdev Yadav at police station Rajpur alleging that the applicant had pushed the deceased Kedwa and assaulted him on the chest with his foot causing internal injuries leading to his death. On the basis of the said report, applicant was arrested. 3. Counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the case. He submits that the incident arose out of a brief altercation and the applicant, who after allegedly consuming liquor only pushed the deceased, he fell down and was admitted to hospital where death occurred due to internal organ failure. It is submitted that there was no intention or knowledge on the part of the applicant to cause death and that the evidence, including examination of material witnesses does not support the prosecution case. It is submitted that the applicant has no previous criminal record and the applicant is in jail since 22.12.2023, the charge sheet has been filed and the trial is likely to take some time, he is ready and willing to comply with any of the conditions which may be imposed upon him and thus, it is submitted that the application be allowed and the applicant be released on bail. 4. Learned counsel for the respondent/State, on the other hand, has opposes the bail application. 3 5. After due consideration of the submissions and the facts on record, it is noted that the case involves serious charges, however, the applicant has already spent a long period of jail custody, the investigation is complete, the charge sheet has been filed and five witnesses have been examined before the trial court and they have turned hostile. Thus, looking to the fact that the final disposal of the trial is likely to take sufficiently long time, the present application deserves to be allowed. Accordingly, her bail application is allowed. 6. It is directed that in the event of applicant executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs. 10,000/- with one surety to the satisfaction of the concerned trial court, she shall be released on bail on the following conditions: i) she shall appear before the trial court regularly on each and every date, unless exempted from appearance. ii) she shall not make any attempt to tamper with the prosecution witnesses. iii) she shall appear before the trial Court on each and every date given to her by the said Court till disposal of the trial, (iv) she shall not involve herself in any offence of similar nature in future. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge