1 2025:CGHC:13963 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 730 of 2019 • B. L. Maharana, S/o Shri Ayodhya Prasad, Aged About 40 Years, Senior Lecturer Dept. Of Mechanical Engg., Rungta College Engg. And Technology, R/o Swami Vivekanand, Ward No.9, Shankar Nagar, Durg, District Durg, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1. RSR, Through Director, Rungta, College Of Engg. And Technology, Rungta Educational Campus, Kohka Road, Kurud, Bhilai, District Durg, Chhattisgarh. 2. GDR Educational Society, Ganjpara, Durg, District Durg, Chhattisgarh. 3. The Registrar, Chhattisgarh Swami Vivekanand, Technical University Bhilai, District Durg, Chhattisgarh. 4. The Secretary, Department Of Higher Education, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 5. The Director, Department Of Technical Education, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 6. All India Council For Technical Education (AICTE), Nelson Mandela Marg, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi-110070. 7. University Grants Commission (UGC) Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi, New Delhi-110002. ... Respondents (Cause title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Jitendra Gupta, Advocate. For Respondents No.1 & 2 : Ms. Palak Dwivedi, counsel appears on behalf of Mr. Saurabh Dangi, Advocate. For State/Respondents No.4 & 5 : Mr. Amandeep Singh, P.L. For Respondent No.7 : Mr. B.S. Rajput, counsel appears on behalf of Mr. R.K. Gupta, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi Order on Board 24/03/2025 1. Heard on I.A. No.4/2025, application for withdrawal of the writ petition. DEEPTI JHA NIRALA Digitally signed by DEEPTI JHA NIRALA 2 2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner wants to withdraw this petition, as matter has been settled down between the parties outside the Court, therefore, he does not want to prosecute the case further. Hence, counsel for the petitioner prayed that petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the instant petition. 3. Counsel appearing for the respective respondents have no objection to allow the limited prayer made by the counsel for the petitioner. 4. On due consideration and for the reasons mentioned in the application, which is well supported by an affidavit, I.A. No.4/2025, application for withdrawal of the writ petition is allowed and the petitioner is permitted to withdraw instant writ petition. 5. Accordingly, instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge