110 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT SHUBHRO JYOTI MUKERJEE ADITI ARORA MUKERJEE CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Mr. Ms. Seerat Saldi, Mr. Animesh Sharma, Advocate and Mr. Akshdeep Singh Sidhu, HARKESH MANUJA By way of present petition filed under Section 10 read with Section 12 of Co initiation of proceedings against respondents for alleged willful non compliance of order dated 28.11.2019 passed in CR operative part thereof is extracted hereunder for reference: and their minor children in the Chamber, the respondent permitted to meet the minor children of the parties once in every three months on a Sunday as per convenience of all concerned. On such day the children shall be with their father from 10:00 AM to 6:00 PM. terms.” Having informed by learned counsel for the parties that the main petition filed under Guardian preferred at the instance of petitioner herein came to be dismissed and besides it, even IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: SHUBHRO JYOTI MUKERJEE Versus ADITI ARORA MUKERJEE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Gaurav Chopra, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Seerat Saldi, Advocate for the Mr. Animesh Sharma, Advocate and Mr. Akshdeep Singh Sidhu, Advocate for the **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) By way of present petition filed under Section 10 read with Section 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, prayer has been made for initiation of proceedings against respondents for alleged willful non compliance of order dated 28.11.2019 passed in CR operative part thereof is extracted hereunder for reference: “In the meanwhile, as per discussions held with the parties and their minor children in the Chamber, the respondent permitted to meet the minor children of the parties once in every three months on a Sunday as per convenience of all concerned. On such day the children shall be with their father from 10:00 AM to 6:00 PM. The present petition stands disposed of in the above Having informed by learned counsel for the parties that the n petition filed under Guardian and Wards Act, preferred at the instance of petitioner herein came to be dismissed and even the first appeal bearing No.FAO IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-1904-2020 Date of Decision: July 31, 2025 ........Petitioner ........Respondent HARKESH MANUJA Gaurav Chopra, Sr. Advocate with Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Animesh Sharma, Advocate and Advocate for the respondent. By way of present petition filed under Section 10 read with ntempt of Courts Act, 1971, prayer has been made for initiation of proceedings against respondents for alleged willful non- compliance of order dated 28.11.2019 passed in CR-209-2018. The operative part thereof is extracted hereunder for reference:- meanwhile, as per discussions held with the parties and their minor children in the Chamber, the respondent-husband is permitted to meet the minor children of the parties once in every three months on a Sunday as per convenience of all concerned. On such day the children shall be with their father from 10:00 AM to 6:00 PM. The present petition stands disposed of in the above Having informed by learned counsel for the parties that the and Wards Act, 1890 which was preferred at the instance of petitioner herein came to be dismissed and bearing No.FAO-615-2021 was also 2020 July 31, 2025 By way of present petition filed under Section 10 read with ntempt of Courts Act, 1971, prayer has been made for - 2018. The meanwhile, as per discussions held with the parties husband is permitted to meet the minor children of the parties once in every three months on a Sunday as per convenience of all concerned. On such The present petition stands disposed of in the above Having informed by learned counsel for the parties that the which was preferred at the instance of petitioner herein came to be dismissed and was also TEJWINDER SINGH 2025.08.02 02:02 I agree to specified portions of this document COCP-1904-2020 -2- rendered infructuous vide order dated 15.01.2025 on account of children having attained the age of majority. In view of the aforesaid, no cause survives in the present petition and the same is thus, disposed of. Rule discharged. 31.07.2025 (HARKESH MANUJA) Tejwinder JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No TEJWINDER SINGH 2025.08.02 02:02 I agree to specified portions of this document