Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 55187 (AP)

Kotana Venkata Ramana v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/3183/2021 · 2025-10-06

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010050722021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 3183/2021 Between: 1. KOTANA VENKATA RAMANA,, S/O APPALANAIDU, AGED 48 YEARS, OCCU- CULTIVATION, R/O HNO 14-154, GORLIVANIPALEM, SABBAVARAMMANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMRAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE TAHSILDAR, SABBAVARAMMANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, , SABBAVARAM POLICE STATION, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 4. GORLI ATCHIMNAIDU, S/O LATE APPALANAIDU, AGE 50 YEARS, R/O GORLIVANIPALEM VILLAGE, SABBAVARAMMANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 5. GORLI NEELESWARA RAO, S/O LATE NEELESWARARAO, AGE 37 YEARS, R/O GORLIVANIPALEM VILLAGE, SABBAVARAMMANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 6. GORLI SATYANARAYANA, S/O LATE RAMU, AGE 50 YEARS, R/O GORLIVANIPALEM VILLAGE, SABBAVARAMMANDAL VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 7. RONGALI SATHYANARAYANA, S/O LATE PERI NAIDU, AGE 60 YEARS, R/O GORLIVANIPALEM VILLAGE, SABBAVARAMMANDAL VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 2 ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S SRINIVASA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. GP FOR REVENUE 3. S.V.S.S.SIVA RAM The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT of MANDAMUS to declare the action of the 2nd Respondent in invoking the proceedings u/s 107 r/w 111 of Cr.P.C in M.C.No.16 of 2020 and thereby 3rd Respondent register the crime in FIR No.711 of 2020 dated 4.9.2020 where civil disputes are pending in O.S.No.91 of 2020 on the file of II Addl Junior Civil Judge, Anakapalli and the police and revenue authorities are interfering with civil disputes which is highly illegal, arbitrary and sub judicie, contrary to law and violative of Articles 300-A, 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently set aside the above impugned and improper proceedings of 2nd Respondent in M.C.No.16 of 2020 and Crime in FIR 711 of 2020 dated 4.9.2020 on the file of the Sabbavaram Police Station, Visakhapatnam District and further direct the Respondents not to interfere with civil disputes and pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem just and proper in facts and circumstances of case to meet the ends of justice.” 2. Heard Sri S. Srinivasa Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Md. Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Sri Md. Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that the police have registered a case against the petitioner herein and others in Crime No.711 of 2020 of Sabbavaram Police Station, for the offence punishable under 3 Section 107 Cr.P.C. Learned Assistant Government Pleader would further submit that only to prevent untoward incidents and mainly to maintain law and order at the disputed land, the said Crime No.711 of 2020 has been registered against the petitioner herein and others. 4. Recording the submissions made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:07.10.2025 Vns