1 / 2 2025:CGHC:55007 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4929 of 2025 1. Manoj Mandal S/o Late Anath Ranjan Mandal Aged About 42 Years R/o Village Tambeshwar Nagar, Police Station And Tahsil Ramanujganj, District Balrampur-Ramanujganj C.G. 2. Sudip Mandal S/o Late Anath Ranjan Mandal Aged About 34 Years R/o Village Tambeshwar Nagar, Police Station And Tahsil Ramanujganj, District Balrampur-Ramanujganj C.G. 3. Anuj Mandal S/o Late Anath Ranjan Mandal Aged About 31 Years R/o Village Tambeshwar Nagar, Police Station and Tahsil Ramanujganj, District Balrampur-Ramanujganj C.G. ... Petitioners versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, Balrampur, District- Balrampur- Ramanujganj C.G. 2. Sub Divisional Officer, Ramanujganj, District- Balrampur-Ramanujganj C.G. 3. Tahsildar, Ramanujganj, District- Balrampur-Ramanujganj C.G. 4. Khokhan Dhar S/o Late Sudhir Dhar Aged About 58 Years R/o Village Tambeshwar Nagar, Police Station And Tahsil Ramanujganj, District Balrampur-Ramanujganj C.G. ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Navneet Kumar Yadav, Advocate For Respondents-State : Mr. Satish Gupta, Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD 12/11/2025 1. Heard. 2. Learned State counsel pointed out that the application seeking compliance of the order passed by Tahsildar in the year 1992 came to be dismissed and further pointed out that in the order sheet dated 30.04.2025 it is mentioned PAWAN KUMAR JHA Digitally signed by PAWAN KUMAR JHA 2 / 2 that the application for compliance of the order was dismissed by the Tahsildar on the ground of delay and laches. 3. The submission of learned counsel for respondent-State is not disputed by the counsel for the petitioner. 4. In the above facts of the case, I do not find any good ground to entertain this petition, accordingly it is dismissed. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) pwn JUDGE