IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI TUESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE rPRESENT: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 11010 OF 2025 Between: Yarlagadda Indhu, W/o Ramesh.Aged about 30 years,R/oD.No.3-139, Water Tank,Doddipatia, West Godavari District. ... Petitioner/Accused No.1 AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Public Prosecutor,High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Amafavati. .... Respondent/Complainant Petition under Section 480 & 483 of BNSS 2023, praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant bail to the Petitioner/Accused No.1 in S.C. No.69 of 2021 on the file of the Court of the Sessions Judge- cum-Mahila Court, Vijayawada, arising out of Crime No.319 of 2018 of Ajit Singh Nagar Police Station, Vijayawada City, pending trial such terms and conditions this HonbLe Court may deem fit and on proper in the interest of justice. as The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of SRI V R MAHESWARA RAO PALETI Advocate for the Petitioner, Assistant Public Prosecutor for respondent and the Court made the following. ORDER 2 Dr. YLR,. 11010 of 2025 ^ Dated 04.11.2025 ^ CrI.P.No. The Court made the following: ORDER: The Criminal Petition has been filed under Sections 437 and 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for brevity ‘the Cr.P.C.’)/ Sections 480 and 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity ‘the BNSS’), seeking to enlarge the petitioner/Accu sed No.1 on bail in S.C.No.69 of 2021 on the file of the learned Sessions Judge- Cum-Mahila Court, Vijayawada in Cr.No.319 of 2015 of Ajit Singh Nagar Police Station, Vijayawada District, registered against the petitioner/Accused No.1 herein for the offences punishable under Sections376 (1), 394, 419, 354(B) read with Sections 120(B), 114 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for brevity ‘the IPC’) and Sections 3, 4 and 5 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned 2. Assistant Public Prosecutor. Perused the record. As seen from the record, P.W.1, who is the star witness for the prosecution, turned hostile. She deposed abysmal ignorance about the of the prosecution. The rest of the unofficial Witnesses of the prosecution also turned hostile. The petitioner could not appear before the learned Trial Court on one occasion and also on 23.01.2025. 3. case 3 Dr. YLR, J CrLP.No.llOlO of 2025 Dated 04.11.2025 Therefore, the learned Trial Court was constrained to issue an NBW against the petitioner. The petitioner was arrested and produced before the learned Trial Court on 21.09.2025. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the reason for not attending before the learned Trial Court on 23.01.2025 is that she met with an accident. Except one or two occasions, the petitioner had never failed to appear before the learned Trial Court on earlier occasions. The learned counsel further on submits that the petitioner has got fixed abode and she is ready to abide by any conditions imposed by this Court for her appearance before the learned Trial Court. All the prosecution witnesses have been examined, and the case is coming for examination of the accused under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If one more opportunity is given, the petitioner will strictly adhere to the conditions imposed by this Court. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of evidence available against the petitioner/Accused No.1 before the learned Trial Court, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner/Accused No.1 on bail subject to the following stringent conditions. i. The petitioner/Accused No.1 shall be enlarged on bail subject to she executing a bond for a sum of Dr. YLR,, Crl.P.No.ll010of2025 ' Dated 04.11.2025 Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand sureties for the like learned Vijayawada. only) with two sum each to the satisfaction of the Judge-Cum-Mahila Sessions Court, "• The petitioner/Accused No.1 shall the learned Trial Court without fail. Failure to Court, the learned Trial Court accordance with law. 5. In the result, the Criminal Petition is allowed. appear before on each and every adjournment appear before the learned Trial is at liberty to proceed in SD/-SK MD RAFi DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECT^I^OFFICER To. 1. The Sessions Judge-cum-Mahila Court, Vijayciwaaa. 2. The Superintendent, District Jail, Vijayawada. 3. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Amaravati. (by RPAD) 4. OneCCto SRI. V R MAHESWARA RAO PALETI Advocate 5. Two CCs to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR [OUT] 6. One spare copy [OPUC] High Court of Andhra Pradesh ksr HIGH COURT DR.YLR, J DATED:04/11/2025 BAIL ORDER CRLP.No.11010of 2025 ALLOWED i