Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
W.P.No.16350 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 30.04.2025 CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN W.P.No.16350 of 2025 Ms.J.Mehana ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Superintendent of Police, Vellipalayam, Elancheran Nagar, Nagapattinam District – 611 001. 2. The Assistant Superintendent of Police, Nagapattinam Circle, Nagapattinam District – 611 001. 3. The Inspector of Police, Town Police Station, Nagapattinam District – 611 001. 4. M/s. Nagai Sivasakthi Sangaya Nala Nidhi Limited, Rep. by its Managing Director, R.K. Ravi, D.No.14, Perumal Mela Veethi, Nagapattinam – 611 001. ... Respondents https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.16350 of 2025 Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 to execute the warrant of arrest issued against R.K.Ravi, Managing Director, M/s. Nagai Sivasakthi Sangaya Nala Nidhi Limited, D.No.14, Perumal Mela Veethi, Nagapattinam – 611 001, 4th respondent herein under Section 72(1) of consumer Protection Act, 2019 in terms of proceedings in E.A.No.46 of 2023 in C.C.184 of 2022 dated 17.07.2023 of the learned District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Nagapattinam, within a time frame as fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Jayaraman For Respondents For R1 to R3 : Mr. A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl. Side) O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed for direction directing the respondents 1 to 3 to execute the warrant of arrest issued against the fourth respondent herein under Section 72(1) of consumer Protection Act, 2019 in E.A.No.46 of 2023 in C.C.184 of 2022 dated 17.07.2023, on the file of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Nagapattinam. 2. It is seen that in the execution petition filed before the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.16350 of 2025 District Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission, Nagapattinam, in E.A.No.46 of 2023 in C.C.No.184 of 2022, the Commission issued non- bailable warrant as against the fourth respondent and it is pending on the file of the third respondent. 3. On instructions, the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondents 1 to 3 submitted that the third respondent could not execute the warrant for want of correct address of the fourth respondent. 4.
In view of the above facts and circumstances, the third respondent is directed to execute the warrant issued as against the fourth respondent in E.A.No.46 of 2023 in C.C.No.184 of 2022, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order. The petitioner is directed to furnish correct address of the fourth respondent and co-operate while execution of warrant as against the fourth respondent. 5. With the above directions, the Writ Petition stands disposed https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.16350 of 2025 of. There shall be no order as to costs. 30.04.2025 Index : Yes/No Neutral citation : Yes/No Speaking/non-speaking order rts https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.16350 of 2025 To
1. The Superintendent of Police, Vellipalayam, Elancheran Nagar, Nagapattinam District – 611 001. 2. The Assistant Superintendent of Police, Nagapattinam Circle, Nagapattinam District – 611 001. 3. The Inspector of Police, Town Police Station, Nagapattinam District – 611 001. 4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. Page 5 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.16350 of 2025 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. rts W.P.No. 16350 of 2025 30.04.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis