W.P.(MD)No.23889 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 02.04.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI W.P(MD)No.23889 of 2025 & W.M.P.(MD)Nos.18762 & 18763 of 2025 Govindaraju ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector cum Monitoring Committee, Office of the Collectorate, Ramanathapuram. 2.The District Revenue Officer, Office of the District Revenue Officer, Ramanathapuram. 3.The Assistant Director of Panchayat, Office of the Assistant Director of Panchayat, Ramanathapuram. 4.The Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District. 5.The Block Development Officer, Office of the Block Development Officer, 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.23889 of 2025 Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District. 6.The Tahsildar, Paramakudi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District. 7.Karthick ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents 1 to 6 to conduct a proper survey and inspection of the irrigation channel passing through S.Nos.229 & 220 of Kothakulam Group, Surikkanenthal Village, Paramakudi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District and enure uninterrupted flow of water to Mosukudi Kanmai. For Petitioner :Mr.D.Senthil For Respondents :Mr.C.Venkatesh Kumar Special Government Pleader for R1 to R4 & R6 : Mr.G.Vairam Santhosh Additional Government Pleader for R5 : Mr.C.Senthil Murugan for R7 ORDER Heard both sides. 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.23889 of 2025 2. The petitioner asserts that an irrigation channel runs through S.Nos.229 & 230 of Kothakulam Group. 3. The instructing official from WRD states that in the records maintained by the department, the existence of the channel is not reflected. The petitioner's counsel states that in SLR and in FMB, the extent of the channel is very much shown. These aspects can be revealed only if a proper survey is conducted. 4. The Tahsildar, Paramakudi Taluk is directed to conduct survey in the presence of the interested persons including the 7th respondent. The petitioner is permitted to file a fresh writ petition based on the outcome of the survey. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. [G.R.S., J.] [B.P., J.] 02.04.2026 NCC : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Index : Yes / No rmi To 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.23889 of 2025 1.The District Collector cum Monitoring Committee, Office of the Collectorate, Ramanathapuram. 2.The District Revenue Officer, Office of the District Revenue Officer, Ramanathapuram. 3.The Assistant Director of Panchayat, Office of the Assistant Director of Panchayat, Ramanathapuram. 4.The Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District. 5.The Block Development Officer, Office of the Block Development Officer, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District. 6.The Tahsildar, Paramakudi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District. G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.23889 of 2025 and B.PUGALENDHI, J. rmi W.P(MD)No.23889 of 2025 02.04.2026 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis