Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 55168 (AP)

K.Prathap Reddy S/o Late Sri Konda Reddy v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/9790/2016 · 2025-05-01

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

t IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH::AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 9790 OF 2016 Between.: K. Prathap Reddy S/o Late Sri Konda Reddy, Working as Field Officer Or.I New & Renewable Energy Development Corporation of Andhra Pradesh Ltd., Ananthapur District. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Energy Department, A.P Secretariat Buildings, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. New & Renewable Energy Development Corporation of Andhra, Pradesh Ltd., rep., by its Vice Chairman and Managing Director, Pisgah Complex, Nampally, Hyderabad. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court be pleased to issue appropriate Writ or any other order or direction particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the the Respondents in issuing petitioner retirement notice dated IS contrary to the provisions of Act, 4, dated 27th June arbitrary and ultra vires the Constitution of India Respondents to continue the petitioner up to 60 years of age in the interest may action of 17-02-2016 2014, illegal, consequently direct the / % of justice and grant such other relief or reliefs as this Hon'ble Court deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the I.A. NO: 1 OF 2016fWPMP. NO- 12373 OF 2016) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondehts to pending disposal of the Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner: M/S. M SHALINI (Not Present) Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR ENERGY (AP) Counsel for the Respondent No.2: R RADHA KRISHNA REDDY The Court made the following: Order may case. continue the petitioner in service I % APHC010630032016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY. THE SECOND DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE [3504] PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM / WRIT PETITION NO: 9790/2016 Between; K.prathap Reddy S/o Late Sri Konda Reddy ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.M SHALINI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.ALAPATI VIVEKANANDA (SC FOR NREDCAP) 2.GP FOR ENERGY (AP) 3.THE ADVOCATE GENERAL (AP) 4.R RADHA KRISHNA REDDY The Court made the following Order; On 25.04.2025, there was no representation for the petitioner. As such, the instant case is directed to be listed today under the caption “for dismissal”. Despite the same, today also none appeared for the petitioner to represent the lis. 2 2. in that view of the matter, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. <,H/ A VENU GOPAL RftO ^tssisTANT REGlSiTRAR //TRUE COPY// section officer To 1. One CC to M/s. M SHALINI Advocate [OPUC] [OUT?"^^ energy (AP), High Court of Andhra 3. One CC to SRI R RADHA KRISHNA REDDY Advocate 4. Three CD Copies Pradesh [OPUC] gsg HIGH COURT DATED: 02/05/2025 ORDER WP.No.9790 of 2016 DISMISSING THE WP FOR NON PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS