Page 1 of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No. 24254 of 2025 Aditya Parida ..... Petitioner Mr. A. Swain, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha & Ors. ..... Opposite Parties Mr. P.K. Panda, ASC CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY ORDER 04.09.2025 Order No. 01 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the Opp. Parties. 3. Petitioner has filed the present writ petition inter alia with the following prayer:- “Under facts and the abovementioned circumstances of the case, this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writs by quashing the order vide no.1691 issued on dtd.19.08.2025 by the opp. party no.3 And further be pleased to direct the opp. party no.3 to re-instate the petitioner in the service as Laboratory Technician And further be pleased to direct the opp. party no.3 to grant all the arrears as well as consequential service benefits to the petitioner Or pass such order(s) /direction(s) as case may be deemed fit and proper in the interest of justice and equity. Page 2 of 2. And for which act of kindness, the petitioner as in duty bound, shall ever pray.” 4. However, taking into account the claim raised in the present Writ Petition, liberty is granted to the Petitioner to make a fresh representation before Opp. Party No. 2 by enclosing all the relevant documents and citations in support of his claim, if any, within a period of two (2) weeks hence. 5. It is observed that if such representation is filed within the aforesaid time period, Opp. Party No. 2 shall do well to take a lawful decision on the same within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of such representation. The order so passed by Opp. Party No. 2 be communicated to the Petitioner. 6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. (BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY) Judge Sneha