Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5516 (GAU)

CHANDI CHARAN ROY AND 4 ORS v. SMTI. AMALESWARI ROY AND 3 ORS

CRP(IO)/14/2025 · 2025-01-21

Devashis Baruah

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010004792025 2025:GAU-AS:665 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : CRP(IO)/14/2025 CHANDI CHARAN ROY AND 4 ORS S/O LATE DIPEN ROY, R/O VILL-KAWNIABHASHA MASPARA, P.O.- KALIPUKHURI, DIST- KOKRAJHAR (BTR), ASSSAM, PIN-783370 2: MANILAL ROY S/O LATE DIPEN ROY R/O VILL-KAWNIABHASHA MASPARA P.O.-KALIPUKHURI DIST- KOKRAJHAR (BTR) ASSSAM PIN-783370 3: SMTI CHAMESWARI ROY W/O LATE DIPEN ROY R/O VILL-KAWNIABHASHA MASPARA P.O.-KALIPUKHURI DIST- KOKRAJHAR (BTR) ASSSAM PIN-783370 4: SMTI ANITA ROY W/O SRI SRINATH ROY D/O DIPEN ROY VILL- SAKATI P.O. AND P.S.-BASUGAON DIST- CHIRANG (BTR) PIN-783372 5: SMTI. SUNITA ROY D/O DIPEN ROY VILL- DHOLMARA P.S. AND DIST- KOKRAJHAR (BTR) PIN-78337 Page No.# 2/3 VERSUS SMTI. AMALESWARI ROY AND 3 ORS W/O LATE DEBURAM ROY, R/O VILL- KAWNIABHASA MASPARA, P.O.- KALIPUKHURI, P.S. AND DIST- KOKRAJHAR (BTR), PIN-783372 2:ROMEN ROY S/O LATE DEBURAM ROY R/O VILL- KAWNIABHASA MASPARA P.O.-KALIPUKHURI P.S. AND DIST- KOKRAJHAR (BTR) PIN-783372 3:SMTI. LECHERI ROY @ BARMAN W/O SRI SONATO BARMAN VILL- LALTARI P.O. AND DIST- KOKRAJHAR (BTR) 4:SMTI. HILESWARI ROY W/O VILL- KAWANIABHASHA MASPARA P.O. AND DIST- KOKRAJHAR (BTR Advocate for the petitioner(s): Mr. A Roshid Advocate for the respondent(s): B E F O R E HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH ORDER 22.01.2025 Mr. A Roshid, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that taking into account that the learned First Appellate Court had exercised its discretion in condoning the delay and the limited scope of the instant proceedings, would not like to further proceed with the instant Page No.# 3/3 proceedings, rather the petitioners would be well advised to participate in the appeal proceedings which has been initiated by the respondents. 2. Taking into account the above, the instant petition stands closed on withdrawal. 3. The withdrawal of the instant petition, however, shall not prejudice the petitioner. JUDGE Comparing Assistant