Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 55159 (PAT)

Rakesh Mandal @ Mantoo Mandal v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./47152/2025 · 2025-10-08

Ashok Kumar Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47152 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-57 Year-2025 Thana- SIMRAHA District- Araria ====================================================== Rakesh Mandal @ Mantoo Mandal S/o Shambhu Mandal R/o Vill- Rahikpur, Thelamohan, Tar Tola, Ward No. 04, P.S.- Sirmaha, Distt- Araria ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vijay Kishore Bharti, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Kumar Veerendra Narayan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 3 08-10-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 352, 351(2), 351(3) and 74 of the B.N.S. and later on Section 103(2) of B.N.S. was added. 3. The case of the prosecution is that petitioner along with others being armed with rod, lathi, gadhahel, dabiya arrived at the house of the informant. It is specifically stated that Shambhu Mandal assaulted with iron rod to the father of the informant due to which he fell down. After that, Anandi Mandal assaulted to Pankaj Mandal. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47152 of 2025(3) dt.08-10-2025 2/2 petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that though the petitioner has been arrayed as an accused in this case but no specific overt act is alleged against him. A statement has been made in para-3 of this petition that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. Moreover, he is languishing in judicial custody since 28.03.2025. 5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer of regular bail. 6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Simraha P.S. Case No. 57 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Araria. Shubham/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T