Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40399-DB MFA No. 6832 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 6832 OF 2024 (MV-D) BETWEEN:
1.
SHAKIRA BANU WO LATE AKTHARHUSSAIN AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS
2. SHABANAPARVEEN DO LATE AKTHARHUSSAIN AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS RO SRINAGARA NEAR MECCA MASJID B M ROAD HASSAN 573201
3. SHIRIN DO LATE AKTHAR HUSSAIN AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS
4.
VASEEM PASHA SDO LATE AKTHAR HUSSAIN AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS P1, 3 AND 4 ARE R/O SRINAGARA, BEHIND JAIL HASSAN 573201 …APPELLANTS (BY SMT. KAVITHA H C., ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed by VANAMALA N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40399-DB MFA No. 6832 of 2024
AND:
1.
SUDEEP H D S/O DIVAKA H V R/O HANUBALU VILALGE AND POST HANBALA HOBLI SAKELSHPURA TALUK HASSAN OWNER OF BIKE BEARING REG NO KA05KK 2396
2.
THE MANAGER ACKO GENEARL INSURANCE COMPANY UNIT NO 301 AND 302 F WING 3RD FLOOR LOTUS CORPORATE BANK GOREGAON NORTH MUMBAI - 400063
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B. PRADEEP, ADVOCATE FOR R2;
NOTICE TO R1 D/W)
THIS MFA IS FILED U/S.173(1) OF MV ACT, AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND AWARD DT.19.06.2024 PASSED IN MVC NO.1865/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HASSAN, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.
BARRED BY TIME.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40399-DB MFA No. 6832 of 2024
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD)
The claimants in M.V.C. No.1865/2021 on the file of the II Additional Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Hassan [for short, 'the Tribunal'] are in appeal. The first claimant is the wife of the deceased Mr. Akthar Hussain, and the other claimants are their children. The claimants and the others, for reasons of convenience, are referred to as the Claimants, the Insured and the Insurer. The Tribunal has granted compensation in a total sum of Rs.10,78,072/- computed thus; Sl. Nos Head Amount A Monthly Income Rs.14,000-00 B Future Prospects ----- C 1/3 deduction towards personal expenses Rs.4,666-00 D Total dependency (A-C) Rs.14,000- 4,666=Rs.9,334/- E Age multiplier 9 F Compensation (Dx12xE) (Rs.9,334/- x 12 x 9) Rs.10,08,072-00
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40399-DB MFA No. 6832 of 2024
G Conventional Heads
H A) Loss of Consortium Rs.40,000-00 I B) Loss of estate Rs.15,000-00 J C) Funeral Expenses Rs.15,000-00 Total Rs.10,78,072-00
2. Ms. Kavitha H.C, the learned counsel for the appellants, and Mr. B. Pradeep, the learned counsel for the Insurer, submit that there is no dispute about [a] the claimants' relationship with the deceased, [b] his demise in the road accident on 13.09.2021, [c] the negligence of the rider of the motorcycle bearing No.KA-05-KK-2396 [the offending vehicle] and [d] the Insurer’s liability to pay just and reasonable compensation. In fact, Ms. Kavitha H.C. submits that this Court must grant enhancement in compensation towards loss of consortium and the loss of dependency. 3. Ms. Kavita H.C, while not disputing that the claimants have not placed on record any evidence to show that the deceased was earning Rs.30,000/- per month, submits that in the case of claim petitions
- 5 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40399-DB MFA No. 6832 of 2024
arising out of accidents in the year 2021, the notional income is taken at Rs.15,000/- per month, but the Tribunal has taken notional income at Rs.14,000/- per month. The learned counsel further contends that the deceased was aged 56 years, and therefore, the addition towards loss of future prospects must be at 10% of the notional income. 4. Mr.
B. Pradeep does not controvert any of these submissions, and he emphasizes that if the loss of dependency is recomputed taking the monthly income at Rs.15,000/- and with addition of 10% thereof towards future prospects, this Court must retain the deduction towards the deceased’s personal expenses at 1/3rd and the multiplier at '9'. These must indeed be so, and the loss of dependency when computed with these parameters but subject to change on the notional income and addition towards future prospects, the claimants will be entitled for
- 6 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40399-DB MFA No. 6832 of 2024
Rs.11,88,000/- towards loss of dependency as against Rs.10,78,072/- awarded by the Tribunal. Details for Computation of Loss of Dependency
Amount [in Rs.] Monthly Income
15,000 Addition towards Future Prospects 10% 1,500 Monthly Income + Future Prospects
16,500 Annual Income 12 1,98,000 Deduction towards personal expenses 1/3 66,000 Multiplicand [after deduction towards personal Expenses] 1,32,000 Multiplier 9
Loss of Dependency
11,88,000/-
5. This Court must observe that it is settled that those who have lost their dear ones in a road accident independent of the question of dependency would be entitled to loss of consortium individually at Rs.40,000/- subject to enhancement at the rate of 10% for every three years from the year 2017. The claimants are four in number and the accident is in the year 2021 and as such, they would be entitled to
- 7 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40399-DB MFA No. 6832 of 2024
Rs.1,76,000/- as against a sum of Rs.40,000/- awarded by the Tribunal. The claimants would thus be entitled for a total compensation of Rs.13,79,000/- as against Rs.10,78,072/- which is brought out by the following comparative table. Compensation Heads By the Tribunal [in Rs.] By this Court [in Rs.] Towards loss of dependency 10,08,072 11,88,000 Towards loss of consortium 40,000 Towards loss of estate 15,000
1,76,000 [1,60,000 + 10%] Towards funeral & obsequies ceremony expenses 15,000 15,000 Total 10,78,072 13,79,000 Enhanced Compensation 3,00,928
In the light of the afore, the following:
ORDER [a] The appeal is allowed in part modifying the Tribunal's impugned
judgment and award dated 19.06.2024 in M.V.C.No.1865/2021
- 8 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40399-DB MFA No. 6832 of 2024
granting to the claimants a total compensation of Rs. 13,79,000/- with an enhancement in a sum of Rs.3,00,928/- at 6% per annum from the date of the petition till the date of deposit.
[b] The respondent - Insurer is called upon to deposit Rs.3,00,928/- with interest as aforesaid within eight [8] weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this Judgment.
Sd/-
(B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE
Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE
RB
- 9 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40399-DB MFA No. 6832 of 2024
27.10.2025 ORAL ORDER ON 'FOR BEING SPOKEN TO' (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD)
This appeal is listed today as this Court wanted clarification on the deduction that must be made towards the personal expenses of the deceased. There are four claimants, and the Tribunal has deducted 1/3rd towards personal expenses.
Ms. Kavitha H. C, the learned counsel for the appellants, submits that when there are four and more dependents not exceeding six, deduction towards personal expenses must be 1/4thand that the Tribunal is not justified in deducting 1/3rd. However, Mr. B. Pradeep, the learned counsel for the second respondent, submits that the undisputed facts are that the claimants are the wife and daughters of the deceased and that the daughters are married and residing separately. If the daughters are married and are residing separately, their dependency on the
- 10 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40399-DB MFA No. 6832 of 2024
deceased father would have vastly reduced and compensation must be computed deducting 1/3rd towards personal expenses as observed by this Court while disposing of the order dated 13.10.2025.
In the light of the afore, the order dictated by this Court on 13.10.2025 stands reiterated on this ground.
Sd/- (B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE
Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE
RB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 70