Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 55150 (PNJ)

AMANDEEP SINGH v. STATE OF HARYANA

CRWP/4684/2025 · 2025-05-13

Manisha Batra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRWP-4684 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND 106 Amandeep Singh State of Haryana CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE Present:- MANISHA BATRA, J. 1. 226 of the Constitution of India the application dated 12.04.2025 (Annexure P petitioner with a prayer to grant parole for a period of 04 weeks to the petitioner. 2. submitted that application before the respondents on 12.04.2025 for granting benefit of parole to the petitioner for the aforementioned period but the same is still pending and no decision has been taken thereon. this stage, the petitioner would be satisfied if appropriate direction is issued to the respondent 3. 4684-2025 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Amandeep Singh Versus Haryana and others CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Mr. Krishan Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. MANISHA BATRA, J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed 226 of the Constitution of India seeking direction to the application dated 12.04.2025 (Annexure P petitioner with a prayer to grant parole for a period of 04 weeks to the At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner ha submitted that the wife of the present petitioner has moved the aforesaid application before the respondents on 12.04.2025 for granting benefit of parole to the petitioner for the aforementioned period but the same is still pending and no decision has been taken thereon. this stage, the petitioner would be satisfied if appropriate direction is issued to respondents to decide the aforesaid application Notice of motion. - IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-4684-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 13.05.2025 ...Petitioner Versus ...Respondents MANISHA BATRA The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article seeking direction to the respondents to decide the application dated 12.04.2025 (Annexure P-4), submitted by the wife of the petitioner with a prayer to grant parole for a period of 04 weeks to the learned counsel for the petitioner ha the wife of the present petitioner has moved the aforesaid application before the respondents on 12.04.2025 for granting benefit of parole to the petitioner for the aforementioned period but the same is still pending and no decision has been taken thereon. It is further submitted that at this stage, the petitioner would be satisfied if appropriate direction is issued to application and take necessary action. -1- 2025 (O&M) 13.05.2025 ...Petitioner ...Respondents Article decide 4), submitted by the wife of the petitioner with a prayer to grant parole for a period of 04 weeks to the learned counsel for the petitioner has the wife of the present petitioner has moved the aforesaid application before the respondents on 12.04.2025 for granting benefit of parole to the petitioner for the aforementioned period but the same is still It is further submitted that at this stage, the petitioner would be satisfied if appropriate direction is issued to and take necessary action. MOHAMMAD WASEEM ANSARI 2025.05.13 17:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-4684 4. Court, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent needful shall be done in due course. 5. present petition is disposed of with a direction to aforesaid application (Annexure P within a period of accordance with law. 13.05.2025 Waseem Ansari Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 4684-2025 (O&M) Mr. Apoorv Garg, Senior DAG, Hary Court, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent needful shall be done in due course. Keeping in view the limited prayer made by the petitioner, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to application (Annexure P-4) submitted by the within a period of one month from today by passing a speakin accordance with law. 13.05.2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable - poorv Garg, Senior DAG, Haryana, who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State and submits that the Keeping in view the limited prayer made by the petitioner, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to decide the submitted by the wife of the petitioner from today by passing a speaking order in (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No -2- who is present in State and submits that the Keeping in view the limited prayer made by the petitioner, the to decide the wife of the petitioner g order in MOHAMMAD WASEEM ANSARI 2025.05.13 17:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document