Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 55144 (ALL)

RAJENDRA KUMAR v. SHRI DIVYA JYOTI, ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION

CAPL/2158/2025 · 2025-09-02

Neeraj Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2158 of 2025 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE NEERAJ TIWARI, J. 1. Heard Chandra Bhan Gupta, learned counsel for applicant and Sri Jagdish Pathak, learned counsel for the opposite party. 2. Learned counsel for the opposite party has filed compliance affidavit, which is taken on record. Based upon affidavit, he submitted that order of Writ Court has been complied with, therefore, this application may be dismissed as infructuous, which is not objected by counsel for applicant. 3. Under such facts of the case no further order is required to be passed. 4. File is consigned to the record. September 3, 2025 Monika Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Chandra Bhan Gupta, Mayank Gaurav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Jagdish Pathak (Neeraj Tiwari,J.) Rajendra Kumar .....Applicant(s) Shri Divya Jyoti, Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, Employees Provident Fund Organization .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- MONIKA KESARWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad