NAVEEN KERKETTA ALIAS NAVEEN KUMAR KERKETTA ALIAS NAVIN KERKETTA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./1391/2025 · 2025-04-11
Ambuj Nath
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5514 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5514 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025: JHHC:11149
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No. 1391 of 2025
Naveen Kerketta @ Naveen Kumar Kerketta @ Navin Kerketta, aged about 40 years, son of Late Yogeshwar Kerketta, resident of Ketari Bagan, Road No. 11, near Jharkhand Public School, P.O and P.S. Namkum, District Ranchi ---
--- Petitioner Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. Manoj Kumar @ Manoj Kumar Singh, son of Late Dayanand Singh, R/o Amrawati Colony, P.O and P.S. Chutiya, District Ranchi (Jharkhand)
---
--- Opp. Party --- CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ambuj Nath
---
For the Petitioner: Mr. Manoj Kr. Choubey, Advocate
For the O.P-State: Mrs. Vandana Bharti, A.P.P.
For the O.P. No. 2: None
--- 04 / 11.04.2025 Nobody appears on behalf of the opposite party no. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P for the State.
2. Petitioner has been made accused in connection with Chutiya P.S. Case No. 117 of 2024 corresponding to G.R. No. 965 of 2024 for the offences registered under sections 406, 420, 427, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of Sri Shambhu Mahto, learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class-VIII, Ranchi.
3. Petitioner is alleged to have entered into an agreement for sale of land to the Informant for a consideration amount of Rs. 10.00 lakhs. The land in question was sold to the Informant by one Sanjay Singh, Power of Attorney holder of Avinash Pandey who was the actual owner of the land.
4. Attention has been drawn towards the agreement entered into between the petitioner and the Informant in the year 2015 in which the Informant has agreed to sell same land to the petitioner.
5. It was submitted that the petitioner was demanding money from the Informant which he has paid as a consideration amount at the time of agreement, due to which, the Informant has implicated the petitioner in this case.
6. In view of the aforesaid facts, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) with two
2. sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of Sri Shambhu Mahto, learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class-VIII, Ranchi in connection with Chutiya P.S. Case No. 117 of 2024 corresponding to G.R. No. 965 of 2024.
(Ambuj Nath, J) Ranjeet/ Uploaded