1 2025:CGHC:20401 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 360 of 2018 1 - Ramesh Kumar Kalash S/o Late Sukhdev Singh Kalash Aged About 59 Years R/o V.I.P. Road, Purana, Raipur, Tehsil And District Raipur (Chhattisgarh), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Dharampal Kalash, S/o Late Sukhdev Singh Kalash Aged About 57 Years R/o V.I.P. Road, Purana, Raipur, Tehsil And District Raipur (Chhattisgarh), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Prakash Kalash, S/o Late Sukhdev Singh Kalash, Aged About 55 Years R/o V.I.P. Road, Purana, Raipur, Tehsil And District Raipur (Chhattisgarh), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Smt. Sarita, W/o Shri Ramesh Kalash, Aged About 52 Years R/o V.I.P. Road, Purana, Raipur, Tehsil And District Raipur (Chhattisgarh), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 5 - Smt. Manju, W/o Shri Dharampal Kalash, Aged About 51 Years R/o V.I.P. Road, Purana, Raipur, Tehsil And District Raipur (Chhattisgarh), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 6 - Smt. Kanchan, W/o Shri Prakash Kalash, Aged About 51 Years R/o V.I.P. Road, Purana, Raipur, Tehsil And District Raipur (Chhattisgarh), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, Raipur, Collector Office, Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Chhattisgarh Housing Board Through State Officer, Office Shankar Nagar, Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Tehsildar, Tehsil Office, Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) 2 For Petitioners : Mr. Ankur Agrawal, Advocate For State : Mr. Pramod Shrivastava, Dy. G.A. Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Judgment On Board 05-05-2025 1) By way of this petition, petitioners have sought following relief(s):- 10.1 A writ and/ or an order in the nature of appropriate writ do issue calling the records of the court below pertaining to the case of the petitioners for perusal of this Hon’ble Court, if this Hon’ble Court thinks it fit in the facts and circumstances of the case. 10.2 A writ and/or an order in the nature of appropriate writ do issue setting aside the impugned order dated 22.01.2018 (Annexure P-1) and grant the temporary injunction to the petitioner, in the facts and circumstances of the case. 10.3 Cost of the proceedings. 10.4 Any other writs and directions that may be deemed fit and just in the facts & circumstances of case. 2) This petition was filed on 16.03.2018 and Registry pointed out certain defaults which are as follows:- (i) certified copy of the order dated 22.01.2018 is not filed. (ii) signature of one of the counsel is not present in the vakalatnama. 3) Thereafter, case was listed for order on defaults on 24.04.2018 , 20.09.2018 and 10.12.2018, where counsel appearing for the petitioners sought time to rectify those defaults, but till date same have not been rectified. 3 4) It appears that petitioners have lost interest in pursuing the matter. Thus, this Court is left with no other alternative, but to dismiss this petition on this count alone. 5) Consequently, this petition stands dismissed. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) JUDGE Ajinkya