1 2025:CGHC:20651 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 1766 of 2018 1 - Pratik Mishra S/o Shri Arun Kumar Mishra Aged About 20 Years R/o Mishra House Pragati Chowk Lakhe Nagar, More Than Mai Garden, Purani Basti, Police Station Purani Basti, District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Arun Kumar Mishra S/o Late Shri Dashrath Mishra Aged About 56 Years R/o Mishra House Pragati Chowk Lakhe Nagar, More Than Mai Garden, Purani Basti, Police Station Purani Basti, District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Appellants versus 1 - Arvind Sahu S/o Shankar Lal Sahu Aged About 27 Years R/o Village Dharampura, Police Station Mana Camp, Raipur, Tahsil And District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ---(Driver And Owner Of Offending Tractor Vehicle Bearing Registration C.G. 04 D.A. 5326 And Trolly No. 04 D.T. - 0194). 2 - IFCO Tokiya General Insurance Company Limited Head Office EFCO Sadan- C-1, District Centre Saket New Delhi, Branch Office, Manager, EFCO Tokiya, General Insurance Company Limited, Third Floor, Flat/shop No. 345-347. Lalganga Shoping Mall, G.E. Road, Raipur, Tahsil Anmd District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ---(Insurer Of Offending Tractor Vehicle Bearing Registration C.G. 04 D.A. 5326 And Trolly No. 04 D.T. - 0194). 3 - The New India Insurance Company Limited Through Manager, The New India Insurance Company Limited, Raipur Digitally signed by HEERA LAL SAHU Date: 2025.05.06 17:44:41 +0530 2 Division -1, LIC Building First Floor, Pandri Raipur, Tahsil And District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ---(Insurer Of Offending Scorpio Vehicle Bearing Registration C.G. 04 H-1919. ... Respondents For Appellants : None. For Respondent No. 2 : Mr. Vaibhav Shukla, Advocate with Ms. Shrejal Gupta, Adv. For Respondent No. 3 : Mr. Anil Gulati, Advocate. For Respondent No. 1 : None. Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal Order on Board 06 / 05 /202 5 1. On 24.04.2025 and today also no one appeared on behalf of the appellants even in the second round. It appears that the appellants are not interested in this case. 2. In the absence of any representation on behalf of the appellants, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. 3. Accordingly, the instant appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) Judge H.L. Sahu