Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 55124 (PNJ)

DINESH v. DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM AND OTHERS

CWP/13079/2025 · 2025-05-08

Jagmohan Bansal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

` CWP-13079-2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 125 CWP-13079-2025 Date of Decision: 08.05.2025 Dinesh …Petitioner Versus Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam and others …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: - Mr. Bhim Sain Mittal, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Rajni Gupta, Advocate for the respondents *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral) 1. The petitioner through instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondent to consider him for the post of Assistant Lineman. 2. The petitioner is having three years diploma in Electrical Engineering. He was engaged by Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam (for short ‘Nigam’) from 18.08.2017 to 14.11.2017 through outsourcing agency. He got himself registered with Haryana Kaushal Rozgar Nigam (‘HKRN’) in 2023. He claims that number of posts are lying vacant in the Nigam, however, he is not considered for the post of Assistant Lineman. 3. Ms. Rajni Gupta, Advocate, who on advance notice is present in Court on behalf of respondent-State, submits that HKRN deputes registered ones on the basis of merit and requisition received from intending MOHIT KUMAR 2025.05.08 17:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgement. ` CWP-13079-2025 -2- Department. As and when requisition would be received and the petitioner would qualify in the merit list, he would be deputed. 4. In the wake of statement of learned counsel for the respondent, the present petition stands disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 08.05.2025 Mohit Kumar Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No MOHIT KUMAR 2025.05.08 17:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgement.