APHC010856872017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2835/2017 Between: 1. K.SOWSEELYA (A-5) KAKINADA.,, W/O. CHIRANJEEVI, (A-5) AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.9-154, MRO STREET, INDRAPALEM VILLAGE, KAKINDA. ...PETITIONER AND 1. KORA INDIRA PRIYANKA TALLAREVU M ANR REP PP, W/O. JAYAVARDHAN, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, OCC: HOUSE WIFE, RIO. D.NO.4-245/1, PATAVALA VILLAGE, TALLAREVU MANDAL, 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of Cr.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to present this Memorandum of Criminal Revision Case against the order passed in Crl.M.P.No.190 of 2016 in Cr.No.17/2015 of C.C.No.32/2017 on the file of the Special Judicial First Class Magistrate, for PROH, & Excise, Kakinada dated 4-2-2017, for the following among other grounds. I.A. No: 1 OF 2017 (CRL.R.C.M.P. 4622 OF 2017) Petition under Section 151 C.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased I.A. No: 2 OF 2017 (CRL.R.C.M.P. 4623 OF 2017) Petition under Section 151 C.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. C SHARAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. N SIVA REDDY 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO Criminal Revision Case No.2835 of 2017 ORDER: This Criminal Revision Case is filed against the order dated 04.02.2017 passed in Crl.M.P.No.190 of 2016 in Cr.No.17 of 2015 of C.C.No.32 of 2017 on the file of the learned Special Judicial Magistrate of First Class, for PROH & Excise, Kakinada. 2. Learned counsel appearing on both sides are present. 3. Both the learned counsel submit that matter has become infructuous due to settlement arrived at between the parties before the Lok Adalat. 4. Recording the said submission of both the learned counsel, this Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. Interim orders granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO, J Date: 05.11.2025 M K K