Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 55117 (AP)

Garikini Rajesh v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

CRLP/11858/2025 · 2025-11-16

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010615942025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 11858/2025 Between: 1. GARIKINI RAJESH, S/O JAGANNADHAM,AGE 29 YEARS, R/O RATNAYAMPETA VILLAGEPAYAKARAOPETA MANDAL, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, THROUGH STATION HOUSE OFFICER,ARAKU VALLEY POLICE STATION, VISAKHAPATNAMREP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT AT AMARAVATI 2. THE BRANCH MANAGER, INDUSINS BANK LIMITEDRAJAMAHENDRAVANAM BRANCH,RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM DISTRICT,VISAKHAPATNAM ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1. RAMINENI SUDHEER Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: ORDER: This Criminal Petition has been filed against the order, dated 03.11.2025, passed in Crl.M.P.No.1047 of 2025 on the file of the learned I Additional District & Sessions Judge-Special Judge for Trial of Offences under NDPS Act, Visakhapatnam to the extent of imposing conditions directing the petitioner herein to execute a bond for Rs.4,00,000/- and also furnish bank guarantee for an amount of Rs.4,00,000/- for release of Mahindra Bolero Pik Up bearing registration No.AP 05 TL 1347 towards interim custody. 2 2. Heard Sri Ramineni Sudheer, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Ms.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for the State. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the Petitioner and acceded to, by the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor that the subject matter of this Criminal Petition is squarely covered by the Order passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court vide Criminal Petition No.655 of 2025, dated 31.01.2025. 4. Considering the submissions made, in view of the said Order passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court in Criminal Petition No.655 of 2025, dated 31.01.2025 and taking into consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case, the condition imposed by the learned Special Judge in the order, dated 03.11.2025, passed in Crl.M.P.No.1047 of 2025, to the extent of directing the petitioner to furnish bank guarantee for a amount of Rs.4,00,000/- is hereby set aside. The petitioner shall execute a bond for Rs.4,00,000/- (Rupees Four Lakhs Only) with two sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Araku. The rest of the conditions imposed by the learned Special Judge shall remain unaltered. 5. With the above said modification, the Criminal Petition is disposed of. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:17.11.2025 Asr 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Crl.P.No.11858 of 2025 Dt.17.11.2025 Asr