CRWP-47 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 113 Amanpreet Singh and State of Punjab Coram : Present: Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. (Oral) 1. the Constitution of India for issuance of direction to respondent protect the life and liberty of the petitioners from the hands of respondents No.4 to 13, who are harassing and threatening the petitioners to eliminate them in order to save their prestige in the society. 2. petitioners are major and married and petitioner no.2 is also having with her wedlock with respondent no.4 Beant Singh, who is presently residing with petitioner no.2. However, both the petitioners are presently not residing with their respective spouse and are living together in live against the petitioners apprehend danger from respondent nos.4 to 13. The petitioners have submitted a representation dated 05.05.2025 (Annexure P for granting protection to their li 3. 4723-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Amanpreet Singh and another Versus State of Punjab and others Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj Mr. Suraj Kaundal, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Monty Goyal, Advocate, for respondent no.4. **** Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. (Oral) The petitioners have filed the present petition under Article 226 the Constitution of India for issuance of direction to respondent protect the life and liberty of the petitioners from the hands of respondents , who are harassing and threatening the petitioners to eliminate them in order to save their prestige in the society. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that both the petitioners are major and married and petitioner no.2 is also having with her wedlock with respondent no.4 Beant Singh, who is presently residing with petitioner no.2. However, both the petitioners are presently not residing with their respective spouse and are living together in live wishes of private respondents. It is further submitted that the petitioners apprehend danger from respondent nos.4 to 13. The petitioners have submitted a representation dated 05.05.2025 (Annexure P for granting protection to their life and liberty. Notice of motion to the official respondents only. - 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-4723-2025 Decided on:08.05.2025 ...Petitioners ...Respondents Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj petitioners have filed the present petition under Article 226 the Constitution of India for issuance of direction to respondent nos.1 to 3 protect the life and liberty of the petitioners from the hands of respondents , who are harassing and threatening the petitioners to eliminate them Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that both the petitioners are major and married and petitioner no.2 is also having one child with her wedlock with respondent no.4 Beant Singh, who is presently residing with petitioner no.2. However, both the petitioners are presently not residing with their respective spouse and are living together in live-in relationship wishes of private respondents. It is further submitted that the petitioners apprehend danger from respondent nos.4 to 13. The petitioners have submitted a representation dated 05.05.2025 (Annexure P-5) to respondent no.2 fe and liberty. Notice of motion to the official respondents only. ...Petitioners ...Respondents of to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners from the hands of respondents , who are harassing and threatening the petitioners to eliminate them Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that both the one child with her wedlock with respondent no.4 Beant Singh, who is presently residing with petitioner no.2. However, both the petitioners are presently not residing in relationship wishes of private respondents. It is further submitted that the petitioners apprehend danger from respondent nos.4 to 13. The petitioners have 5) to respondent no.2 VINOD KUMAR 2025.05.09 10:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-47 4. of the respondent 5. value of the docume direction to respondent no.2 representation (Annexure P any threat to their life and liberty is pe 6. It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by them. This order would not be understood having expressed any opinion whatsoever by this Court on the validity of their live May 08, 2025 vinod* 4723-2025 Mr. Tarun Aggarwal, Addl. A.G., Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State. Without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a direction to respondent no.2- Commissioner of Police, Ludhiana representation (Annexure P-5) of the petitioners and grant them protection, if any threat to their life and liberty is perceived. It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by them. This order would not be understood having expressed any opinion whatsoever t on the validity of their live-in relationship. May 08, 2025 Whether Speaking/Reasoned: Whether Reportable: - 2 - Mr. Tarun Aggarwal, Addl. A.G., Punjab, accepts notice on behalf Without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary nts placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a Commissioner of Police, Ludhiana, to decide the ) of the petitioners and grant them protection, if rceived. It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by them. This order would not be understood having expressed any opinion whatsoever in relationship. (Rajesh Bhardwaj) Judge Whether Speaking/Reasoned: NO/YES NO/YES Mr. Tarun Aggarwal, Addl. A.G., Punjab, accepts notice on behalf Without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary nts placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a , to decide the ) of the petitioners and grant them protection, if It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by them. This order would not be understood having expressed any opinion whatsoever VINOD KUMAR 2025.05.09 10:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document