Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5509 (JHR)

VIKASH TIWARI ALIAS VIKASH KR TIWARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

W.P.(Cr.)/171/2025 · 2025-06-11

Rajesh Kumar, Sujit Narayan Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2025:JHHC:15156-DB ) - 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (Cr.) No. 171 of 2025 ---- Vikash Tiwari @ Vikash Kr. Tiwari, aged about 30 years, son of Jitendra Tiwary, resident of Village-Mango, Diaguttu, Road No.11, P.O. & P.S. – Mango, District-East Singhbhum, Jamshedpur. … … Petitioner Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2. The Secretary, Department of Home, Government of Jharkhand, Project Bhawan, P.O.-Dhurwa, P.S.- Jagannathpur, District-Ranchi. 3. The District Magistrate cum Deputy Commissioner, East Singhbhum at Jamshedpur Office at Old Gandak Road, P.O. & P.S.-Sakchi, Jamshedpur, District-East Singhbhum. 4. The Senior Superintendent of Police, Jamshedpur, office at near Jubliee Park, P.O. & P.S. – Sakchi, Jamshedpur, District-Jamshedpur. … … Respondents ------- CORAM :HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Jitendra Shankar Singh, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Manish Kumar, Sr. SC II -------- Order No. 05 : Dated 11th June, 2025 1. The instant writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for quashing order dated 01.11.2024 passed by respondent no. 3 whereby and whereunder the petitioner’s detention has been extended for further three months till 08.02.2025, who was put under preventive detention under Section 12(2) of the Jharkhand Control of Crimes Act vide order dated 09.05.2024. 2. It appears that vide order dated 22.01.2025 passed by the respondent no. 3-District Magistrate, Singhbhum East, Jamshedpur, the period of detention of the petitioner has ( 2025:JHHC:15156-DB ) - 2 - further been extended from 09.02.2025 to 08.05.2025, as would be evident from order dated 22.01.2025, which has been made part of the writ petition by filing I.A. No. 2842 of 2025. 3. This Court considering the fact that the detention order was effective till 08.05.2025, as such the writ petition, as on date, has lost its force. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed. (Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.) (Rajesh Kumar, J.) Alankar/