Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 55088 (KAR)

M/S SAI SECURITIES v. REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER

WP/13457/2021 · 2025-12-02

Jyoti M

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50144 WP No. 13457 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 13457 OF 2021 (L-PF) BETWEEN: M/S SAI SECURITIES ANDRADE ARCADE DAINA CIRCLE UDUPI-576 101 REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR SRI. SURAJ …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MANJUNATHA B, ADVOCATE) AND: REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER EPF ORGANISATION 2ND AND 3RD FLOOR TULUNADU TOWERS COURT ROAD UDUPI -576 101 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. M. PRADEEP, ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: Digitally signed by THEJAS KUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50144 WP No. 13457 of 2021 ORAL ORDER Sri.Manjunath B. counsel for the petitioner appeared in person. 2. Sri.Manjunath B. counsel for the petitioner submits that a memo has been filed stating that the petition may be dismissed as having become infructuous. Counsel therefore, submits that the memo may be placed on record and the petition may be dismissed as having become infructuous. 3. When queried, counsel submits that a conscious decision is taken about the withdrawal of the writ petition. 4. The oral submission and the memo is placed on record. 5. The writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 10