APHC010267202024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] SATURDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 13334/2024 Between: MANUKINDI BHUDEVI @ BHULAKSHMI, W/O SHANKAR, HINDU, AGED 55 YEARS. AGRICULTURIST, R/O H.NO. 3-160, KADUMUR VILLAGE, MIDTHUR MANDAL, NANDYALA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF A P, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELGAPUDI VILLAGE, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NANDYAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MIDTHUR POLICE STATION, NANDYAL DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. BUDIGE BHOJA RAAM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of Respondents 2 and in not enquiring on the petitioners complaint dated 3-1-2024 is illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the Respondents 2 and 3 to act upon petitioners complaint dated 3-1-2024 in accordance with Code of Criminal Procedure.” 2 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri B.Bhoja Raam, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that, no further orders are required in this matter as the relief has become infructuous. 3. Sri V.Farooq, leaned Assistant Public Prosecutor for Home would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is dismissed as the relief has become infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:22.11.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.13334 of 2024 Dt.22.11.2025 Dinesh