Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:16984] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Application No.367/2013 In S.B. Civil Restoration Application No. 151/2013 In S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 1540/2008 Ram Sahai ----Petitioner Versus Meetha Lal And Others ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. B.B. Ojha For Respondent(s) : Mr. V.P. Mathur HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA
Order 22/04/2025 In S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Application No.367/2013:- Matter comes up on an application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay in filling the restoration application. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed. The delay in filing the restoration application is condoned. In S.B. Civil Restoration Application No. 151/2013
1. This restoration application has been filed for recalling of the
order dated 21.10.2008 as well as consequential order dated
23.03.2010.
2.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the aforesaid orders passed, could not be complied with due to in-advertance
[2025:RJ-JP:16984] (2 of 2) [CRES-151/2013] and it is a case where the claim petition has been dismissed. He further submits that there is no deliberate and mala fide intention in filing PF and notices, therefore, in the interest of justice, the appeal may be restored to its original number.
3.
Learned counsel for the respondent vehemently opposed the restoration application.
4. Having considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and for the reasons mentioned in the restoration application, the same is allowed.
5. The appeal is ordered to be restored to its original number.
(MANEESH SHARMA),J DEEPA RANI -30