- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40322 WP No. 36077 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 36077 OF 2024 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: M/S. VIJAYANAGAR ECO VILLAGE PVT. LTD., (EARLIER KNOWN AS ADDRESS MAKER HOUSING DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED) A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.36, 1ST FLOOR, 2ND MAIN, 1ST CROSS, NANJAPPA LAYOUT, NEAR KRISHNA GARDEN, BANGALORE - 560 059, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER SRI. VENKAT CHALASANI. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. DHARANEESHWARAN K, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. KARNATAKA REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY #1/14, 2ND FLOOR, SILVER JUBILEE BLOCK, UNITY BUILDING BACKSIDE, CSI COMPOUND, 3RD CROSS, MISSION ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 027, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. SMT. SAVITHA PRABHAKAR, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40322 WP No. 36077 of 2024 WIFE OF SRI. M P PRABHAKAR, 3. SMT. INDU J, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, WIFE OF NANDAKUMAR, 4. SRI. SUJAYDEV, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, SON OF S. JAVARE GOWDA, ALL ARE RESIDING AT NO.634, 6TH MAIN, 4TH CROSS, 2ND BLOCK, BSK 1ST STAGE, BENGALURU - 560 050. (RESPONDENTS 2 TO 4 ARE COMPLAINANT NO.1 TO 3 IN COMP. NO. 910/2024) 5. SMT. S GEETHA, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, WIFE OF SRI. SUGAVANAM R, RESIDING AT NO. 107, VIDYARAYANAPURA MAIN ROAD, RAMACHANDRAPURA, BLOOM FIELD GARDENS, BENGALURU NORTH, BENGALURU - 560 097. (COMPLAINANT IN COMP. NO. 922/2024) 6. SMT. PARIMALAM G AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, WIFE OF SRI. T.S. VASANTHA, RESIDING AT NO. 220, ABHYUDAYA, 1ST 'A' MAIN ROAD, NEAR WATER TANK, KASTURINAGAR, KALYANNAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 043. (COMPLAINANT IN COMP. NO. 929/2024) - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40322 WP No. 36077 of 2024 7. SMT. GOWRAMMA, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, WIFE OF SRI. G.M. MAHADEVARAJU, NO. 85, 5TH CROSS, NEAR DURGAPARAMESHWARI TEMPLE, VIDYAGIRI LAYOUT, CHANDRA LAYOUT, NAGARBHAVI, BANGALORE - 560 072. (COMPLAINANT IN COMP. NO. 930/2024) 8. SMT. USHA SRIDHAR AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, WIFE OF SRI. N.G. SRIDHAR, RESIDING AT H9/434, KEDAR BUILDING, LOKPURAM, APNA BAZAR, S.O. THANE, MAHARASHTRA, THANE - 499 619. (COMPLAINANT IN COMP. NO. 931/2024) 9. SMT. PRABHAVATHI N, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, WIFE OF SRI. JAYAPPA HEGDE H.G., RESIDING AT NO. 501, 4TH MAIN, 11TH 'A' CROSS, WEST OF CHOD ROAD, RAJAJINAGAR, MAHALAXMIPURAM, BENGALURU, BANGALORE - 560 086. (COMPLAINANT IN COMP. NO. 939/2024) 10. M/S. VINYAS CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD., A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, HAVING ITS NO.4, ANJANEYANAGARA, ITTAMADU, PADMANABHANAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 083, ALSO AT 1ST FLOOR, NO. 998, 50 FEET ROAD, 1ST BLOCK, BANASHANKARI III STAGE, - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40322 WP No. 36077 of 2024 KATHRIGUPPE, BANGALORE - 560 085, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR SRI. SRINIVAS. …RESPONDENTS *** THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE ORDER DATED 12.11.2024 (THE "IMPUGNED ORDER") AT ANNEXURE-A (SHORT ORDER) AND B (DETAILED ORDER SENT BY EMAIL), PASSED BY FIRST RESPONDENT IN COMPLAINT NO.922/2024, 929 TO 931 AND 939/2024, ETC., THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. Petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: "(a) Issue a writ of certiorari quashing the order dated 12.11.2024 (the "Impugned Order") at Annexure-A (short order) and B (detailed order sent by email), passed by first respondent in Complaint No.922/2024, 929 to 931 and 939/2024, (b) Pass such other orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit in the interest of justice and equity." - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40322 WP No. 36077 of 2024 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo, seeking permission of the Court to withdraw the petition. The said memo reads as follows: "The petitioner has since filed a comprehensive suit and also seek such others before the KRERA in accordance with law, as they are legally entitled to and as may be advised to them. In the above circumstances, this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to permit the Petitioner to withdraw the above petition, with liberty to proceed in accordance with law and render justice. The memo may be kindly taken on record and render justice." 3. Placing the memo on record, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE BMV* List No.: 1 Sl No.: 110 CT: BHK