Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:93391 Court No. - 10 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5473 of 2025 Petitioner :- Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation Ltd. And 3 Others Respondent :- Ms Monty Construction Company Counsel for Petitioner :- Narendra Kumar Tiwari,Sr. Advocate Counsel for Respondent :- Ashish Tyagi,Kapil Tyagi Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J. Heard Mr. Shambhu Chopra, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. Narendra Kumar Tiwari for the petitioner and Mr. Manu Saxena, learned counsel for the respondents. At the very outset, Shri Manu Saxena, learned counsel for the respondent raises a preliminary objection with regard to maintainability of the writ petition on the ground that against the impugned order, the petitioner has equally, efficacious alternative remedy of filing an appeal. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the said fact. In view of the above as well as the judgements of the Apex Court in United Bank of India Vs. Satyawati Tondon & Others [(2010) 8 SCC 110] (paragraph no. 43), Radha Krishan Industries Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & Others [(2021) 6 SCC 771] (paragraph no. 27.5) and Varimadugu Obi Reddy Vs. B. Sreenivasulu & Others [(2023) 2 SCC 168] (paragraph no. 36), the writ petition is dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy. Certified copy, if any, may be returned after retaining its photostat copy. Order Date :- 30.5.2025 Rahul Dwivedi/- Digitally signed by :- RAHUL DWIVEDI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad