Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 55072 (KAR)

T SUSILAMMA v. SAMPANGI NAIDU NALLAPPAGARI

MFA/1024/2023 · 2025-04-26

Lok Adalath

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF APRIL 2025 CONCILIATORS PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA & SMT. SOHANI HOLLA, MEMBER M.F.A.No.1024/2023 (MV) (Lok Adalat No.2166/2025) BETWEEN: 1. T. SUSILAMMA W/O LATE T. GANGAPPA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, 2. KUMARI T. CHANDHINI D/O LATE T. GANGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 15 YEARS, 3. KUMARI T. SANJANA D/O LATE T. GANGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 14 YEARS, 4. T. GANGAMMA W/O LATE T. VENKATESAPPA, AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDING AT NEAR GANESHA TEMPLE, SINGASANDRA, HOSUR ROAD, BANGALORE. SINCE THE 2ND & 3RD APPELLANTS ARE MINORS REPRESENTED BY THEIR MOTHER 1ST APPELLANT AS NATURAL GUARDIAN. 2 NATIVE ADDRESS: NO.2-26, KODAGALLU, VENKATAGIRI KOTA, CHITTOOR, A.P. ...APPELLANTS (BY SRI SREENIVASAIAH A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SAMPANGI NAIDU NALLAPPAGARI S/O G. GANTLAPPA NO.10-146, KAREPALLI, V KOTA, CHITTOR, ANDHRA PRADESH-517424. 2. THE MANAGER, THE CHOLAMANDALAM M.S. GEN. INS. CO. LTD., NO.4/9, 6TH FLOOR, GOLDEN HEIGHT BUILDING, STAR BAZAAR, RAJKUMAR ROAD, RAJAJINAGAR, BENGALURU-560010. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI A N KRISHNA SWAMY., ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 01.10.2021 PASSED IN MVC NO.1736/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE XVI ADDITIONAL JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, BENGALURU SCCH-14 PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED. 3 CONCILIATION ORDER The learned counsel appearing for the appellants - claimants are present. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent – Insurance Company along with its representative is present. 2. After prolonged negotiations, the matter is settled. A joint memo signed by the learned advocate appearing for the appellants/claimants (being authorized by the appellants/claimants to sign) and the learned advocate appearing for the respondent-Insurance Company and its authorized officer is filed. The appellants-claimants have agreed to receive and the respondent -Insurance Company has agreed to pay a lump-sum of Rs.7,00,000/- (Rupees Seven Lakh only), in addition to what has been awarded by the Tribunal, in full and final settlement of the claim. 3. The Respondent - Insurance Company has agreed to deposit the said amount before the Tribunal within six weeks from the date of preparation of award, failing which, the said amount shall carry interest at the rate of 9% p.a. from the date of default, till the date of deposit. 4. The apportionment, deposit and release of the enhanced compensation amount shall be made in terms of the Judgment and Award passed by the Claims Tribunal. 4 5. This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint memo. The Judgment and Award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly. Draw up the Award accordingly. Sd/- Judge Sd/- MEMBER AT