Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 55070 (AP)

GUMMETHALA REDDEIAH v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/7606/2025 · 2025-10-13

Nyapathy Vijay

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010146252025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] TUESDAY,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 7606/2025 Between: 1. GUMMETHALA REDDEIAH, S/O. G. LAKSHMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, OCC MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER (UNDER SUSPENSION), R/O. D. NO. 51-12H-6-6, FLAT NO.05, LOKA HEIGHTS, N.G.O. COLONY, NEAR CHAITANYA SCHOOL, KOTHAPETA RAYACHOTY CITY, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT, A.P. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEVELOPMENT, D. NO. 12-47, PVS ICON, PATHURU CROSS ROAD, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT, R.AYACHOTY. 4. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, Y.S.R. KADAPA DISTRICT, KADAPA. 5. ZILLA PRAJA PARISHAD Z P P, REP. BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, NAGARAJUPETA, KADAPA, Y.S.R. KADAPA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any writ, order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent authorities more particularly the Respondent No.3 in issuing the impugned suspension order vide Rc.No.E2/188/2025 dated 10.03.2025 by suspending the Petitioner from the post of Mandal Parishad Development Officer, Lakkireddipalle Mandal, now Annamayya District without issuing any prior notice and without sought any explanation from the Petitioner as arbitrary, illegal, void, against the principles of natural justice, against the service rules in vogue and violative of Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the same and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass an interim order by suspending the impugned Suspension Order vide Rc.No.E2/188/2025 dated 10.03.2025 issued by the Respondent No.3, until disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SRINIVASA RAO NARRA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SERVICES I The Court made the following: 3 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY W.P.No.7606 of 2025 ORDER : Learned counsel for the Petitioner filed memo dated 18.09.2025 vide USR No.115868 of 2025 seeking permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition. Permission as sought for is accorded. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to pursue the legal remedies as and when occasion arises. No order as to costs. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions if any shall stand dismissed. ___________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date:14.10.2025 KLP