DEEPAK AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER
CRM-M/27850/2024 · 2025-01-21
Manjari Nehru Kaul
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 55065 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 55065 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
323
CRM-M-27850-2024 Date of decision: 21.01.2025
DEEPAK AND ANOTHER
....Petitioner V/s
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER
....Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL
Present: Mr. Aashish Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Yuvraj Shandilya, AAG, Haryana.
Mr.Tanvir, Advocate for
Mr.Davneet Sangwan, Advocate for respondent No.2.
***** MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, J. (ORAL)
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that concededly it is a case wherein the petitioners are seeking quashing of the FIR in question only qua them to the exclusion of 3rd accused, who is not a party to the compromise as well as arraigned as a petitioner in the present case. He further submits that in view of the Division Bench judgment of this Court in the case of Rakesh Das versus State of Haryana and another passed in CRM-M No. 48043 of 2023, dated 12.11.2024, he does not press this petition at this stage.
2.
Dismissed as not pressed.
(MANJARI NEHRU KAUL) January 21, 2025
JUDGE poonam
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No POONAM RATHORE 2025.01.22 10:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh