Research › Search › Judgment
Bombay High Court · body
2025 DAILYLAW 55061 (BOM)
SEVKARAM S/O HIRAMAN GADAMDE v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR EXECUTIVE MAGISTRATE ADDITIONAL TAHSILDAR OFFICE DEOLAPAR DIST NAGPUR
WP/725/2025 · 2025-09-16
Shri M M Nerlikar
body2025
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 55061 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 55061 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 28 wp 725.25 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 725/2025 (Sevkram S/o Hiraman Gadamde & ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra & anr.) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. P.A. Lohambare, Advocate for petitioners. Mr. A.M. Joshi, APP for respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
CORAM: M. M. NERLIKAR,
J .
DATED : 16/09/2025. Heard.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that pursuant to the notice issued under Section 130 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (“BNSS”), he had appeared in the matter and he contested there. Considering this fact, he seeks withdrawal of the present petition.
3. Permission is granted.
4. Petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.
5. Needless to mention that it is expected from the concerned officer to follow the procedure contemplated under the provisions of BNSS.
( M. M. NERLIKAR
, J.)
Gohane