APHC010094752022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3207] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND CONTEMPT CASE NO: 606/2022 Between: 1. RAYUDU RAJKUMAR, S/O. LATE SATHYANARAYANA, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, V.L.W. CONTRACTOR, KATERU, RAJAHMUNDRY RURAL MANDAL, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, A.P. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI GOPALAKRISHNA TRIVEDI, THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. 2. SRI KONA SASIDHAR, THE COMMISSIONER, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, N.H.16, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. 3. SRI C HARI KIRAN IAS, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, KAKINADA, A.P. 4. SRI A B V VARAPRASAD, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PANCHAYAT RAJ DIVISION, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, A.P. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents / contemnors for wilfully disobeying the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in W.P. No. 24968/2021 dated 29-10- 2021 under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 and in accordance with Article 215 of the Constitution of India and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K SUBRAHMANYAM Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. KIRAN KUMAR VADLAMUDI The Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND CONTEMPT CASE No.606 of 2022 ORDER: This Contempt Case is filed against the respondents complaining wilful disobedience of the order, dated 29.10.2021 in W.P.No.24968 of 2021. 2. During the course of hearing today, learned counsel appearing for the respondents submit that the order of this Court is complied with and the payments are made to the petitioner as directed by this Court. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner also endorsed the same. 4. In view of the above factual position, in our considered view, no further adjudication is required in the Contempt Case. 5. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the Contempt Case shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND Date: 28.11.2025 PGR THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND CONTEMPT CASE No.606 of 2022 Date: 28.11.2025 PGR