RAVINDRA @ RUSTAM AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
NA528/16279/2025 · 2025-05-15
Vikas Budhwar
Special Leave Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 55059 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 55059 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:81137 Court No. - 73 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 16279 of 2025 Applicant :- Ravindra @ Rustam And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Prasoon Kumar,Sarvjeet Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Vikas Budhwar,J.
1. Sri Prasoon Kumar, learned counsel for the applicants, on instructions, submits that though the application has been preferred to quash the non bailable warrant dated 08.10.2021 against the Applicants issued by learned Judicial Magistrate, Court No.1, Mathura in Criminal case no.811 of 2013, Under Section 498A, 323, 504, 506 Indian Penal Code and 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 at Police Station Vrindavan Chauki Jait, District Mathura, however, he seeks direction for consideration of his bail application in light of the judgment in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another; decided on 07.10.2021 in S.L.P. No.5191 of 2021.
2. Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the same.
3. Thus, interference is declined and the application is consigned to record.
4. In the opinion of the Court, once a bail application is preferred then the same shall be considered with most expeditions strictly as per the law of the land without any delay. Order Date :- 16.5.2025 Rajesh Digitally signed by :- RAJESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad