APHC010570962025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 29708/2025 Between: 1. N SURENDRA, S/O VENKATARAMAYA R/O RAJEEV NAGAR COLONY, PELERU MANDAL AND VILLAGE, ANNAMAYA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY PRINCIPLE SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, RAYACHOTI, ANNAMAYA DISTRICT. 3. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PILER, URBAN POLICE STATION, ANNAMAYA DISTRICT 4. THE SUB INSPECTOR, PILER, URBAN POLICE STATION, ANNAMAYA DISTRICT. 5. RAMESH CHANDRA BEHERA, S/O CHAKRAPANI B AGE 46 , BUSINESS R/O SREEDHAR NAGAR, PARALEKEMUNDI ODISHA 6. SIRLA RAMARAO, S/O KRISHNA RAO AGE 45 BUSINESS R/O D.NO. 27-6/8, AYODYA NAHAR, MADURAWADA, VIZAG -530048 7. M RAMARAO, S/O A MAHANTHI, AGE 36 YEARS, BUSINESS R/O D.NO 3-56/1, GUMPAM, PASUPARTIREGA, VIZINAGARAM. 8. RK MISRO, S/O SURYANARAYANA M AGED 37 YEARS BUSINESS 2 R/O D.NO. 5-322,BHRAMIN STREET, PATAPATNAM- 532213. 9. K GOVINDA RAO, S/O RAMARAO, AGE 44 YEARS. BUSINESS, R/O D.NO. 356-LA,NOPADA, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT-532211 10. ROWTHU SRINIVAS RAO, S/O R RAMA MURTHY, AGE 30 YEARS BUSINESS, R/O D.NO A 56/A, BUDATHAVALASA VILLAGE LAVERU, SRIKAKULAM 532403 11. ANJANA DAS, W/O DEBASHIS MISRA DAS AGE 50 YEARS. BUSINESS R/O D.NO 561/3A EERAVALA STREET, PARLEKAMUDI, DAJAPATHI DISTRICT, ORISSA- 761200 12. RAMARAO RAULO, S/O DRUVARDANA AGE- 62 YEARS. BUSINESS, R/OD. NO. 76-25/A 80-BURJANGO, VIA PARLEKAMUDI DAJAPATHI DISTRICT, ORISSA- 761200 13. VIJAYA BHASKAR REDDY, S/O NOT KNOWN AGE NOT KNOWN BUSINESS R/O PAYTHRAPURA BANGALORE- 560045 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or direction, especially on in nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring inaction of the respondents No.2 to 4 in non registering the FIR on complaint made on 29-08-2025 27-08-2025,made by the petitioner is illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, contrary to the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code, and violative of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of the India and consequently direct the respondents No.2 to 4 forthwith to register the FIR on complaint made on 29-08-2025 27-08-2025,made by the petitioner for the offence under 420,406, 409, 120B, 506 of IPC /61,318,314(l)(2),351of BNS and Section 138 of Negotiable instruments act 1881 against the respondents No.5 to 13 and be please to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to issue interim directions to the respondents No.2 to 4 to initiate action and conduct preliminary enquiry in pursuance to the complaint made by the petitioner on complaint made on 29.08.2025 27.08.2025,made by the petitioner, pending disposal of the writ petition and be pleased to pass 3 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VINODIN RUTH MADAPALLI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 4 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 29708 of 2025 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue a writ or direction, especially on in nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring inaction of the respondents No.2 to 4 in non registering the FIR on complaint made on 29-08-2025 & 27- 08-2025, made by the petitioner is illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, contrary to the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code, and violative of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of the India and consequently direct the respondents No.2 to 4 forthwith to register the FIR on complaint made on 29-08-2025 & 27-08-2025, made by the petitioner for the offence under 420, 406, 409, 120-B, 506 of IPC /61,318,314(1)(2),351 of BNS and Section 138 of Negotiable instruments act 1881 against the respondents No.5 to 13 and be please to pass…” 2. Heard Sri Vinodin Ruth Madapalli, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the official respondents. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that the complaint presented to the police by the petitioner is pending for enquiry. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of, giving liberty to the petitioner to pursue the complaint. 5 5. Recording the same, this Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to pursue the complaint before the police by furnishing complete details. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 04.11.2025. UPS 6 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.29708 of 2025 Dated.04.11.2025 UPS 29