Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 55056 (AP)

G.Venkata Lakshmi, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/22065/2015 · 2025-10-12

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010178912015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) i MONDAY,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 22065 OF 2015 S= Between: 1. G.Venkata Lakshmi, W/o Govinda Rao aged about 33 years. R/o D.No,37-6-17, Satyanagar, Visakhapatnam. 2. B.M.V.S. Appa Rao, S/o. Penta Rao, aged about 42 years, R/o D.No.9- 1-24, Ring Road, Anakapalli, Visakhapatnam District. 3. C.Govinda, S/o Ramulu, aged about 39 years, R/o D.No.39-1-6, Muralinagar East, Visakhapatnam. 4. K.Akkunaidu S/o Late Appanna, aged about Kundrapuvanipalem, K-Kotapadu Mandal, Visakhapatnam 5. K.Satyanarayana Murthy. S/o Late Krishna 43 years, R/o District. Murthy, aged about 45 Madhavadara Vuda Colony, R/o Plot No.MIG, 168 Visakhapatnam District. 6. G.Govinda Rao, S/o Late Challamnaidu allo.37-6-17, Satyanagar, Visakhapatnam. years, aged about 41 years, R/o ...PETITIONERS AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Municipal Administration Development Department, Hyderabad, Rep. by its Principal Secretary 2. The Grater Visakhapatnam Municipal Rep. by its Commissioner. 1. & Urban Secretariat, Secretariat Buildings, Corporation, Visakhapatnam, 3. Sri Praveen Kumar, Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam. Commissioner, The Greater Visakhapatnam ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Articie 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2"'" respondent in rejecting application of the petitioners for construction of Stilt + G + Two Upper Floors RCC Roof residential building in Sy.No.50/4P and 47 with an extent of 288.88 sq. yards situated in Murali Nagar, Madhavadara Village Visakhapatnam through Endorsement in B.A.No.11567/2013/ACP/IV/G-2, dated.. .4.2015 and consequential dated 19.6.2015 is highly illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the provisions of the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation 1955 and colourable exercise of the endorsement B.A.No. 11567/2013/AC P/IV/G-2, Act, power and set aside the same and sanction plan in favour of + G + Two Upper Floors RCC Roof residential building in Sy,No.50/4P and 47 with an extent of 288.88 sq. yards Situated in Murali Nagar, Madhavadara Village, Visakhapatnam. consequently direct the respondents to release the the petitioner for construction of Stilt jA NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP 28436 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to release the for construction of Stilt sanction plan in favour of the petitioner + G + Two Upper Floors RCC Roof residential building in Sy.No.50/4P and 47 with an extent of 288.88 sq. yards situated in Murali Nagar, Madhavadara Village, Visakhapatnam, Petition. pending disposal of the Writ \. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI V. V. N. NARAYANA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.1:GP FOR MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION & URBAN DEVELOPMENT Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI A.S.C.BOSE Counsel for the Respondent No.3: The Court made the following order: SC FOR GVMC APHC010178912015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY.THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 22065/2015 Between: 1.G.VENKATA LAKSHMI W/0 GOVINDA RAO, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/0 D.NO,37-6-17, SATYANAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM. j 2.B.M.V.S. APPA RAO,, S/0 PENTA RAO, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/O D.NO.9-1-24, RING ROAD, ANAKAPALLI, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 3.C.GOVINDA,, S/O RAMULU, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/O D.N0.39- 1-6, MURALINAGAR EAST, VISAKHAPATNAM. 4.K.AKKUNAIDU,, S/O LATE APPANNA, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/O KUNDRAPUVANIPALEM, K-KOTAPADU MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 5.K.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY,, S/O LATE KRISHNA MURTHY, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O PLOT NO.MIG, 168, MADHAVADARA VUDA COLONY, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 6.G.GOVINDA RAO,, S/O LATE CHALLAMNAIDU, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/O ALLO.37-6-17, SATYANAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION & URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. 2 2. THE GRATER VISAKHAPATNAM VISAKHAPATNAM, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. SRI PRAVEEN KUMAR, MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, COMMISSIONER, THE GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1.VVN NARAYANA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.S LAKSHMINARAYANA REDDY(SC FOR GVMC) 2.GP-MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP) The Court made the following: 3 ORDER:- The writ petition is filed challenging the action of the 2"*^ respondent in rejecting the application of the petitioners for construction of a Stilt + G + Two Upper Floors RCC Roof residential building in Sy. Nos.50/4P and 47, with an extent of 288.88 sq. yards, situated in Murali Nagar, Madhavadara Village, Visakhapatnam, through Endorsement in B.A.No.11567/2013/ACP/IV/G -2, consequential endorsement dated. .04.2015 and the B.A.No.11567/2013/ACP/IV/G-2, dated 19.06.2015. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the GVMC, upon written 2. instructions, submits that the petitioners submitted a set of applications in the year 2019 and that the respondent authorities have sanctioned the building permission. In view of the same, nothing further is required to be adjudicated on 3. merits. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed off. There shall be no order as 4. to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. 5. Sd/- M SRINIVAS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, Urban Municipal Administration & of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat 1. The Principal Secretary Development Department, State Buildings, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. The Commissioner, Grater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam. 3. One CC to Sri V. V. N. Narayana Rao, Advocate [OPUC] > 4. One CC to Sri A.S.C. Bose, SC for GVMC[OPUC] 5. Two CCs to GP for Municipal Administration and Urban Development High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 6. Two CD Copies. ssb .4 A' -’■'f 'X -l;- •i HIGH COURT DATED; 13/10/2025 ORDER WP No. 22065 OF 2015 DISPOSING OF THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS