Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP Nos. 796 & 810/2025
Decided on: 10.01.2025
1. CWP No. 796/2025 Rajesh Kumar
…Petitioner
Versus State of H.P. & Anr.
.…Respondents.
2. CWP No. 810/2025 Ashish Kumar & Ors.
…Petitioner
Versus State of H.P. & Anr.
.…Respondents. ………………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners Ms. Anchal, Advocate.
For the respondents: Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional
Advocate General.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua , J Notice. Mr. L.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the issue involved and the relief prayed for by the petitioners have already been adjudicated in Mohit Sharma and Anr. Vs. State of H.P. and others2. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that the petitioners would be content, if the cases of the petitioners 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes 22 CWP No. 1638 of 2024, decided on 29.11.2024
2
are considered by the respondents in light of the aforesaid judgment within a time bound schedule. Learned Additional Advocate General has no objection to this prayer.
4. Having regard to above submissions but without examining the merits of the matter, these petitions are disposed of by directing the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners in light of the aforesaid judgment and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. The decision so arrived at, shall be communicated to the petitioners. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also to stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 10th January 2025(rohit)