Kalapala Pedda Ramulu v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/7424/2018 · 2025-11-23
Ninala Jayasurya
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 55049 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 55049 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010223372018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA WRIT PETITION No.7424 OF 2018 Between:
1. Kalapala Pedda Ramulu, S/o Kalapala Abbaiah, Aged about 71 years, R/o H.No.6-19, SC Peta, Taduvoi village, Jangareddygudem Mandal, West Godavari District, and another. ...Petitioners
AND
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Thullulru Mandal Amaravathi, Guntur District, and others. ...Respondents Counsel for the Petitioners : Mr.V.Ganesh Bhujanga Rao Counsel for the Respondents: G.P. for Assignment
G.P. for Social Welfare
The Court made the following ORDER:
The present writ petition is filed seeking the following relief:
“ … … declaring the action of the respondents 2 to 6 in issuing the Pattadar pass books, Title deeds and also D-Form Patta in favour of third parties who are not the beneficiaries of the Bhoodhan Gramdhan Act and also violated Under Section14(1) of Act, 13 of the Bhoodhan, Gramdhan Act is illegal, arbitrary, unjust and violation of Articles, 14, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 2 to 6 to sanction the benefits issued by the 6th respondents in favour of the petitioner while treating him as legitimate beneficiary of the originally allotted land to an extent of Ac. 1-00 in
2
Sy.No. 102/19 situated at Taduwais Village, Jangareddygudem Mandal, West Godavari District. …”
2. The learned counsel for the petitioners while furnishing the copies of the orders in Writ Petition No.33980 of 2018 and Writ Petition No.34076 of 2018, dated 20.9.2018, states that the present writ petition can as well be disposed of, by passing similar order. 3. Mr.K.Arjun Chowdary, learned Assistant Government Pleader, however, placed a copy of the written instructions dated 17.11.2025 received from the respondent No.4 for perusal of this Court, wherein it is, inter alia stated that there is no such proposal existed to acquire subject land under R&R. A copy of the Pattadar Adangal dated 17.11.2025 is enclosed to the said instructions, in respect of the subject land, wherein the name of petitioner No.1 is reflected in the enjoyers’ column. 4.
In the light of the said instructions, this Court is inclined to dispose of the writ petition, leaving it open to the petitioner to seek recourse to law, in the event any fresh cause of action arises. 5. With the above observation, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ NINALA JAYASURYA,J November 24, 2025 vasu