Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 55043 (KAR)

SMT. RAMYA PRABHAKAR v. SRI. SANJAY SURYANARAYANA

CMP/118/2025 · 2025-11-21

Suraj Govindaraj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48210 CMP No. 118 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ CIVIL MISC. PETITION NO. 118 OF 2025 BETWEEN: SMT. RAMYA PRABHAKAR W/O PRABHAKAR SHIVANNA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/AT NO.433/D, REDTREE GRAND G1, 7TH B MAIN ROAD, 9TH CROSS, NARAYANAGAR 3RD BLOCK, DODDAKALLASANDRA, BENGALURU - 560 062. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VENKATESH PRASAD R, ADVOCATE) AND: SRI. SANJAY SURYANARAYANA 433C, REDTREE CLASSIC, FLAT T1, 7TH B MAIN ROAD, 9TH CROSS, NARAYANAGAR 3RD BLOCK, DODDAKALLASANDRA, BENGALURU - 560 062. …RESPONDENT THIS CMP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11(5) OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 PRAYING TO EXERCISE THE POWERS UNDER SEC.11(6) OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 AND REFER THE DISPUTE TO THE ARBITRATION AS PROVIDED IN CLAUSE NO.15 OF THE AGREEMENT OF SALE DATED 27.10.2023 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE D TO ANY PERSON QUALIFIED TO Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48210 CMP No. 118 of 2025 CONDUCT ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS, PREFERABLY BY A RETIRED DISTRICT JUDGE AT BANGALORE OR AT ARBITRATION CENTRE, BANGALORE, AS MAY BE DECIDED BY THIS HONBLE COURT TO ADJUDICATE THE DISPUTES THAT HAVE ARISEN BETWEEN THE PETITIONER AND RESPONDENT AND ALSO PASS SUCH OTHER DIRECTIONS OR ORDERS AS THIS HONBLE COURT MAY DEEM IT FIT AND NECESSARY IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE AND IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition. 2. The memo is placed on record and the petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to the petitioner to issue a proper notice under Section 21 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act and approach this Court, if necessary. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE GH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 96