Vaddenguntia Venkateswara Rao v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/33995/2025 · 2025-12-07
D Ramesh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 55043 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 55043 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010655872025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] MONDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 33995/2025 Between:
1. VADDENGUNTIA VENKATESWARA RAO, S/O LATE LAKHMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, OCC- AGRICULTURIST, R/O PAPINENIPALLI VILLAGE, ARDAVEEDU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT
3. THE SUBCOLLECTOR, MARKAPUR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT
4. THE TAHSILDAR, ARDAVEEDU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT
5. THE MANDAL REVENUE INSPECTOR, ARDAVEEDU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction declaring the inaction of the 3rd respondent, not take up stay petition filed in appeal No.584 of 2025 by the petitioner against the 4th respondents resumption order dated 17-07-2025 as illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice and contrary to the provisions of under the AP POT Act and consequently to suspend the operation of the resumption
order passed by the 4th respondent dated 17-07- 2025 vide
-2- W.P. No.33995 OF 2025 Date of order:08.12.2025
Rc.No.B/44/2025 in so for the petitioners land in Sy.No.53/4 an extent of Ac 3.78 cents situated in Papinenipalli Revenue Village, Ardaveedu Mandal, Prakasam District and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to suspend the operation of the resumption order passed by the 4th respondent dated 17-07- 2025 vide Rc.No.B/44/2025 in so for the petitioner’s land in Sy.No.53/4 an extent of Ac 3.78 cents situated in Papinenipalli Revenue Village, Ardaveedu Mandal, Prakasam District pending disposal Writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. B S REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following:
-3- W.P. No.33995 OF 2025 Date of order:08.12.2025
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH WRIT PETITION No.33995 OF 2025
ORDER:
1. The instant writ petition has been filed challenging the inaction of the 3rd respondent in not taking up the stay petition filed by the petitioner in Appeal No.584 of 2025, which was preferred against the order dated 17.07.2025 in Rc.No.B/44/2025 passed by the 4th respondent and seeking interim suspension of the said order.
2. The grievance of the petitioner is that the 4th respondent, Tahsildar, Ardaveedu Mandal, Prakasam District, passed an order dated 17.07.2025 against the petitioner and others alleging violation of the conditions under sub-Sections (1) and (2) of Section 3 of the A.P. Assigned Lands (Prohibition of Transfers) Act, 1977, and consequently directed the 5th respondent, Mandal Revenue Inspector, to take possession of the land. Aggrieved by the said order, the petitioner preferred a statutory appeal before the 3rd respondent on
01.08.2025. However, despite the repeated requests made by the petitioner, the 3rd respondent has not taken up the appeal and the stay application.
3. Upon hearing the submissions and on perusal of the record, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the writ petition is
disposed of directing the 3rd respondent to consider Appeal No.584 of
-4- W.P. No.33995 OF 2025 Date of order:08.12.2025
2025 and pass appropriate orders on the stay application within one month from the date of receipt of this order. Till the disposal of the interim stay application, the respondents shall not take any further steps pursuant to the orders dated 17.07.2025.No order as to costs.
4. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. _________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH Dt.08.12.2025 BV