SRI. RAGHURAM, v. THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES
WP/26095/2024 · 2025-07-14
Suraj Govindaraj
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 55039 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 55039 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26004 WP No. 26095 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF JULY, 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
WRIT PETITION NO. 26095 OF 2024 (CS-RES)
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI. RAGHURAM, AGED 41 YEARS, S/O VENUGOPAL RAO, R/AT BEHIND SAI BABA MANDIR, VITALAPUR ROAD, AGOLI POST, GANGAVATHI, KOPPALA - 583 231.
2.
SMT. VIJAYASHREE, AGED 63 YEARS, W/O VENUGOPAL RAO, R/AT BEHIND SAI BABA MANDIR, VITALAPUR ROAD, AGOLI POST, GANGAVATHI, KOPPALA - 583 231.
3.
SHREE RAM, AGED 47 YEARS, S/O VENUGOPAL RAO, R/AT BEHIND SAI BABA MANDIR, VITALAPUR ROAD, AGOLI POST, GANGAVATHI, KOPPALA - 583 231. …PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. PREREET JAIN B, ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26004 WP No. 26095 of 2024
AND:
1.
THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES,
"SOUHARDA SAHAKAARI SOUDHA", NO.68, 1ST FLOOR, MARGOSA ROAD, MALLESHWARAM, BANGALORE - 560 055.
2.
GANGAVATHI CITY PATTINA SOUHARDA SAHAKARI NIYAMITA, REP. BY ITS MANAGER, OFFICE AT OPP. CANARA BANK, WEEKLY MARKET YARD, GANGAVATHI, KOPPALA DISTRICT - 583 221. …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. YOGESH D. NAIK, AGA FOR R1;
SRI. SHOWRI H.R, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED AWARD DATED 14.07.2023 IN PROCEEDINGS VIDE ANNX-D AND SALE NOTICE VIDE ANNX-E BY THE R-1 AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26004 WP No. 26095 of 2024
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
ORAL ORDER
1. Petitioners have filed a memo dated 14.07.2025 signed by petitioner No.1 and counsel for the petitioners. He submits that petitioner No.1 is authorized to sign the memo on behalf of all the petitioners and that all the other petitioners have instructed him to withdraw the above petition. Placing his submission on record, memo is accepted.
2. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
3. The amount-in-deposit is directed to be released in favour of respondent No.2 after complying due formalities.
4. Liberty is reserved to the petitioners to approach the appropriate Authorities.
5. All pending interlocutory applications stand disposed of.
SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE
VM List No.: 2 Sl No.: 6 CT: BHK