Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 55039 (CHH)

PARMANAND SAHU v. GULAM GAUSH

WP227/233/2022 · 2025-05-05

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:20797 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 233 of 2022 1. Parmanand Sahu S/o Chakram Sahu Aged About 45 Years R/o Sakri (P), Palari, Tahsil - Palari, District - Baloda Bazar- Bhatapara Chhatisgarh. 2. Govind Sahu S/o Chakram Sahu Aged About 40 Years R/o Sakri (P), Palari, Tahsil-Palari, District Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara Chhattisgarh. 3. Saroj Sahu W/o Parmanand Sahu Aged About 37 Years R/o Sakri (P), Palari, Tahsil-Palari, District - Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara Chhattisgarh. 4. Amrika Sahu W/o Govind Sahu Aged About 35 Years R/o Sakri (P), Palari, Tahsil-Palari, District - Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioners Versus 1. Gulam Gaush S/o Najirulhak Aged About 64 Years R/o Sakri (P), Palari, Tahsil Palari, District - Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara Chhattisgarh. (Planintiff) 2. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, Baloda Bazar, District - Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents For Petitioners : None appeared even in two round For Respondent No. 2 : Mr. Shubham Bajpai, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 06/05/2025 1. The petitioners have filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):- “10.1 That, this Hon’ble Court, may kindly call for the entire record in relates to the case of the petitioners. 10.2 That, this Hon’ble Court, may kindly be pleased to issued a writ / or writs / order / or orders / to quashed the impugned order dated 26.03.2022 (Annexure P/1), passed by the Learned First Civil Judge, Class : I, Baloda Bazar, Bhatapara, District Baloda Bazar – Bhatapara (C.G.), in Civil Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI 2 Suit No. 59A/2019, and further be pleased to allow the application under order 26, Rule 9 of Civil Procedure Code, in the interest of justice. 10.3 That, any other relief, this Hon’ble Court, deem fit and proper may also kindly be granted to the petitioners, in the interest of justice.” 2. As per office report, Civil Suit No. 59/2019 has already been disposed of by the learned trial Court on 25.10.2024. Thus, the petition has become infructuous. 3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed being rendered infructuous. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge vatti